Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Oragenics, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Table of Contents

4902 Eisenhower Blvd., Suite 125

Tampa, Florida 33634

March 29, 2017

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of shareholders of Oragenics, Inc., which will be held on May 4, 2017, beginning at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time. The meeting will be held at the Grand Hyatt Tampa Bay, 2900 Bayport Drive, Tampa, Florida 33607. The purpose of the meeting is to consider and vote upon the proposals explained in the accompanying notice of annual meeting of shareholders and the proxy statement.

A formal notice describing the business to come before the meeting, a proxy statement and a proxy card are enclosed. We have also enclosed our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K for your review, which contains detailed information concerning our financial performance and activities during 2016.

It is important that your shares be represented at the annual meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting in person, please vote your shares by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card, and returning it in the enclosed, postage-paid envelope. If you later decide to attend the annual meeting and vote in person, or if you wish to revoke your proxy for any reason before the vote at the annual meeting, you may do so and your proxy will have no further effect.

Enclosures

Table of Contents

ORAGENICS, INC.

4902 Eisenhower Blvd., Suite 125

Tampa, Florida 33634

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 4, 2017

Notice is hereby given to the shareholders of Oragenics, Inc., a Florida Corporation (the “Company”) that the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (including any postponements or adjournments thereof, the “Annual Meeting”) will be held at the Grand Hyatt Tampa Bay, 2900 Bayport Drive, Tampa, Florida 33607 on May 4, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:

All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Information relating to the Annual Meeting and matters to be considered and voted upon at the Annual Meeting are set forth in the attached Proxy Statement.

Only those shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2017, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. A complete list of shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination by any shareholder at the Annual Meeting and for a period of ten days prior thereto at the executive offices of the Company in Tampa, Florida.

WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE VOTE, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED BUSINESS REPLY ENVELOPE. IF YOU ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING YOU MAY, IF YOU WISH, WITHDRAW YOUR PROXY APPOINTMENT AND VOTE IN PERSON.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 4, 2017.

This Proxy Statement and our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, which was filed on February 27, 2017, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, except for exhibits, are available at: www.oragenics.com/annualreport.html

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

ii

Table of Contents

ORAGENICS, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK

FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY  4, 2017

General

This Proxy Statement is furnished to shareholders, of Oragenics, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”), in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Company’s Board of Directors from shareholders for use at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 9:00 a.m. local time at the Grand Hyatt Tampa Bay, 2900 Bayport Drive, Tampa, Florida 33607 on May 4, 2017 (including any postponements or adjournments thereof, the “Annual Meeting”).

The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying Proxy are first being mailed to shareholders of the Company on or about March 29, 2017.

Record Date and Voting Securities

Only shareholders of record of the Company at the close of business on March 21, 2017 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 49,274,219 shares of common stock issued and outstanding (“Common Stock”) and no shares of our preferred stock were outstanding. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held.

Notwithstanding the Record Date specified above, the Company’s stock transfer books will not be closed and shares may be transferred subsequent to the Record Date. However, all votes must be cast in the names of shareholders of record on the Record Date.

Quorum Requirement

The holders of record of a majority of the votes of Common Stock entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting, present in person or by proxy, are required to establish a quorum for the Annual Meeting and for voting on each matter. A broker non-vote is when a brokerage firm or bank holding shares of record for their customers in street name does not receive specific instructions from their customers, as the beneficial owners, and the brokerage firm or bank advises that it lacks discretionary voting authority on a particular proposal and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.

Vote Required

PROPOSAL I: Election of Directors. The election of five Directors by the holders of Common Stock will require a plurality of the votes cast by the shares of Common Stock represented and entitled to vote in the election at the Annual Meeting. With respect to the election of Directors, shareholders may (i) vote “for” each of the nominees, (ii) withhold authority for each of such nominees, or (iii) withhold authority for specific nominees but vote for the other nominees. Because the Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the shares represented and entitled

1

Table of Contents

to vote and are running unopposed, any nominee can be elected upon any affirmative vote regardless of whether such nominee receives more than 50% of the shareholder vote. Votes that are withheld or a broker non-vote will have no effect on the outcome of the election of Directors.

PROPOSAL II: To conduct an advisory vote on executive compensation.

PROPOSAL III: Ratification of the selection of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. as the Company’s independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2017 will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present or represented at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will not be counted in the ratification of the selection of independent auditors and will have no effect on the outcome of the selection of the independent auditors. The ratification of accountants is a routine proposal on which a broker or other nominee is generally empowered to vote in the absence of voting instructions from the beneficial owner, so broker non-votes are unlikely to result from this proposal.

PROPOSAL IV: Approval of an amendment to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan increasing the number of common shares available for issuance under the 2012 Incentive Plan by 1,500,000 shares. Approval requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock of the Company present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting for approval of the plan amendment. With respect to this proposal, shareholders may (i) vote “for” the proposal, (ii) vote “against” the proposal, or (iii) abstain from voting. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal. Abstentions have the same effect as votes against the proposal.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote your shares:

Voting

All shares entitled to vote and represented by properly executed proxies received prior to the Annual Meeting, and not revoked, will be voted at the annual meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated. If you submit a proxy and do not make voting selections, the shares represented by that proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board. If any other matters are properly presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting, including, among other things, consideration of a motion to adjourn the annual meeting to another time or place (including, without limitation, for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies), the persons named as proxies and acting thereunder will have discretion to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment. To the extent permitted by Rule 14a-4(c) of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the persons named as proxies on the proxy cards will have discretionary authority to vote in their judgment on any proposals properly presented by shareholders for consideration at the Annual Meeting that were not submitted to the Company within a reasonable time prior to the mailing of these proxy materials. At the time this proxy statement was mailed, we were unaware of any matters proposed to be acted on at the Annual Meeting other than those discussed in this proxy statement.

Shareholders of record — If your shares are registered directly in your name with Oragenics’ transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the shareholder of record, and the proxy materials and Annual Report have been sent directly to you. As a shareholder of record, you may instruct the proxy holders how to vote your shares by completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the postage pre-paid envelope provided. Proxy cards submitted by mail must be received by the time of the Annual Meeting in order for your shares to be voted. If you sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted as recommended by our Board.

2

Table of Contents

If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may also submit your vote in person, and any previous votes that you submitted, will be superseded by the vote that you cast at the Annual Meeting. If you plan to attend the annual meeting, please bring proof of identification for entrance to the annual meeting.

Beneficial owners — Many Oragenics shareholders hold their shares through a broker, trustee or other nominee, rather than directly in their own name. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a bank or another nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in “street name,” and the Annual Meeting proxy materials have been forwarded to you by your broker, trustee or nominee who is considered, with respect to those shares, the shareholder of record. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, trustee or other nominee on how to vote your shares, and you will receive instructions from them that you must follow in order to have your shares voted. The instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee will indicate if Internet and telephone voting are available, and if they are available, will provide details regarding Internet and telephone voting.

Because a beneficial owner is not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting.

Changing Vote; Revocability of Proxies

Subject to any rules your broker, trustee or nominee may have, you may change your proxy instructions at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting.

Shareholders of record — If you are a shareholder of record, you may change your vote (1) by delivering to us (Attention: Corporate Secretary, 4902 Eisenhower Blvd., Suite 125, Tampa, Florida 33634), prior to your shares being voted at the Annual Meeting, a later dated written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy card, or (2) by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person (although attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy). A shareholder of record that has voted on the Internet or by telephone may also change his or her vote by subsequently making a timely and valid later Internet or telephone vote.

Beneficial owners — If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may change your vote (1) by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, trustee or nominee, or (2) if you have obtained a legal proxy from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares, by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

Effect of Not Casting Your Vote

Shareholders of record — If you are a shareholder of record and you do not cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial owners — If you hold your shares in street name it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of directors (Proposal I) and to conduct an advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal II) and for the increase in the shares available under the Company’s Plan (Proposal IV) since those are considered non-routine proposals under applicable NYSE MKT rules. Under the rules of the NYSE MKT LLC, if you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee in a timely fashion how to vote your shares (so-called “broker non-votes”) the broker or nominee can vote your shares as it sees fit only on matters that are determined to be routine, and not on any other proposal. The proposal for the ratification of the auditors (Proposal III) is considered to be a routine proposal under NYSE MKT rules and your nominee can vote on such proposals even if it does not receive voting instructions from you. However, your nominee cannot vote on Proposal I, Proposal II or Proposal IV without your voting instructions. Please be sure to give specific voting instructions so that your vote can be counted.

3

Table of Contents

Expenses of Solicitation

We will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of the Proxy Materials, the Notice, and any additional materials furnished to shareholders. Copies of proxy solicitation material will be furnished to brokerage houses, fiduciaries, and custodians holding shares in their names which are beneficially owned by others to forward to such beneficial owners. In addition, we may reimburse such persons for their cost of forwarding the solicitation material to such beneficial owners. Solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by one or more of telephone, email, telegram, facsimile, or personal solicitation by our directors, officers, or regular employees. No additional compensation will be paid for such services.

Shareholder Proposals to Be Presented at Next Annual Meeting

Requirements for shareholder proposals to be considered for inclusion in Oragenics’ proxy materials. Shareholders interested in submitting a proper proposal for inclusion in the proxy materials for our next annual meeting may do so by submitting such proposal in writing to our offices located at 4902 Eisenhower Blvd., Suite 125, Tampa, Florida 33634, Attn: Corporate Secretary. To be eligible for inclusion, stockholder proposals must be received by us not less than 120 days before the one year anniversary on which Oragenics’ first mailed its proxy statement to shareholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting of shareholders, which will be November 29, 2017 for the next annual meeting, and must otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting has been changed more than 30 days from the one year anniversary of the date of the previous year’s meeting, then the deadline for receipt of notice by the shareholder is within a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and send its proxy materials in order to be eligible for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement and Proxy relating to that meeting.

Requirements for shareholder business or nominations to be brought before Oragenics’ annual meetings. Our bylaws do not establish an advance notice procedure for shareholders who wish to present certain matters, including nominations of persons for election to the Board and shareholder proposals not included in our proxy statement, to be brought before an annual meeting of shareholders. Shareholder proposals, including the nomination of a person for election to the Board, brought before the meeting should consider including, among other things: information as follows: (i) a description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting and the reasons for conducting the business at the meeting, (ii) the name and address, as they appear on the Company’s books, of the shareholder submitting the proposal, (iii) the number of shares that are beneficially owned by such shareholder, (iv) the dates on which the shareholder acquired the shares, (v) documentary support for any claim of beneficial ownership, (vi) any material interest of the shareholder in the proposal, (vii) a statement in support of the proposal, and (viii) any other information that may be required by applicable rules and regulations of the Commission.

Shareholders may also submit a recommendation (as opposed to a formal nomination) for a candidate for membership on our Board by following the procedures set forth in “Corporate Governance —Meetings of the Board of Directors — Shareholder Recommendation of Nominees.”

Delivery of Proxy Materials to Shareholders

If you share an address with another shareholder, each shareholder may not receive a separate copy of the Notice or Proxy Materials. Shareholders may request to receive a separate copy of the Notice or Proxy Materials, by writing to Oragenics, Inc., 4902 Eisenhower Blvd., Suite 125, Tampa, Florida 33634, Attention: Corporate Secretary or calling 813-286-7900. Alternatively, shareholders who share an address and receive multiple copies of the Notice or Proxy Materials may request to receive a single copy by following the same instructions.

4

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL I

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees

The Board of Directors currently is comprised of five Board members including Dr. Frederick W. Telling, Robert C. Koski, Charles L. Pope, Dr. Alan Dunton, and Dr. Alan Joslyn. All of our existing Directors are nominated for re-election at the Annual Meeting. If elected, each of the Directors will hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successor is elected and qualified, or as otherwise provided by the Company’s Bylaws or by Florida law.

If any of the nominees should be unavailable to serve for any reason, the Board of Directors may:

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR EACH DIRECTOR NOMINEE.

If a choice is specified on the Proxy by the shareholder, the shares will be voted as specified. If no specification is made, the shares will be voted FOR the Director nominees. Election of each Director nominee will require the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast by shares of Common Stock represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Information About Nominees

Information about each nominee as of March 29, 2017 is set forth below:

Directors of the Company

Dr. Frederick W. Telling. Dr. Telling was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors on February 4, 2011. He has served as a Director since June 2010. Dr. Telling retired from Pfizer Inc. in June 2007 after 30 years of service. At Pfizer Dr. Telling served as its Corporate Vice President and Vice President of Corporate Strategic Planning and Policy. Dr. Telling also serves as a director, the Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Audit Committee at CTI BioPharma, Inc. (NASDAQ: CTIC), a public company based in Seattle, Washington. Dr. Telling also serves on the boards of various civic and non-profit organizations. Dr. Telling holds a B.A. degree in History and Economics from Hamilton College and a MA degree in Industrial and Labor Relations and a PhD in Economics and Public Policy from Cornell University.

5

Table of Contents

Dr. Telling brings to our Board an extensive array of business and industry experience as well as experience as a director of public companies.

Alan F. Joslyn, Ph.D. Dr. Joslyn has served as a Director of our company since June 2016. Since 2009 he has served as Board member of Synergy Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: SGYP). Since 2014, Dr. Joslyn has been a partner in Lazarus Pharmaceuticals, LL. From March 2010 to April 2014, Dr. Joslyn served as CEO and a Director of Sentinella Pharmaceuticals and from August 2009 to October 2012 as CEO and Director of Edusa Pharmaceuticals, both privately held biotechnology companies. From March 2007 to March 2009, Dr. Joslyn served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Mt. Cook Pharma and as Senior Vice President of Research & Development at Penwest Pharmaceuticals from 2004 to 2007. From 1995 to 2004, Dr. Joslyn held a number of leadership positions within Johnson & Johnson focusing on development of gastroenterology products including Propulsid^®, Motilium^®, Aciphex^® and prucalopride. Dr. Joslyn received his B.S. in medicinal chemistry, B.A. in biology and Ph.D. in biochemical pharmacology from the State University of New York at Buffalo.

Dr. Joslyn brings to our Board over two decades of experience in the pharmaceutical industry and extensive expertise in gastroenterology and infectious disease product development.

Robert C. Koski. Mr. Koski has served as a Director since June 2009. Mr. Koski has practiced as an attorney with the Koski Firm, a sole proprietorship located in Atlanta, Georgia since 1992, where his practice includes litigation and tax law. Mr. Koski has also served as a partner in the Koski Family Limited Partnership, which beneficially owns a controlling interest in the Company, and as a director of the Koski Family Foundation since December 1996. Mr. Koski holds a B.A. degree in Philosophy and English from Colgate University, a JD from Emory School of Law and an LLM degree in Taxation and Litigation from Emory University.

Mr. Koski brings to our Board over two decades of experience in the legal field as a practicing attorney. In addition to his legal experience, Mr. Koski’s educational background provides a foundation for leadership and consensus-building.

Charles L. Pope. Mr. Pope has served as a Director since June 2010. Mr. Pope served as the Chief Financial Officer of Palm Bancorp, Inc. from June 2009 to June 2012. From September 2007 through June 2009, Mr. Pope served as the Chief Financial Officer of Aerosonic Inc., a manufacturer of aviation products. Mr. Pope served as the Chief Financial Officer of Reptron Inc., a manufacturer of electronic products, from March 2005 through June 2007. From March 2002 to March 2005, Mr. Pope served as Chief Financial Officer of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. From February 2001 to March 2002, Mr. Pope served as Chief Financial Officer of Innovaro, Inc. (formerly UTEK Corporation NYSE MKT:INV) a public company. Mr. Pope served as a director of Innovaro, Inc. from March 2010 to August 2012. He is also a director of Inuvo, Inc. (NYSE MKT: INV), a public company, specialized in marketing browser – based consumer applications, managing networks of website publishers and operating specialty websites. Prior to this time, Mr. Pope served as a Partner in the Audit and Financial Advisory Consulting Divisions of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, and he was also a Partner in the Accounting and SEC Directorate in PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s New York City office. Mr. Pope holds a B.S. degree in Economics and Accounting from Auburn University and is a Certified Public Accountant in Florida.

Mr. Pope brings to our Board over three decades of experience in the finance and accounting fields. In addition, Mr. Pope also has experience serving as a director of public companies.

Dr. Alan W. Dunton. Dr. Dunton has served as a Director since April 2011. Dr. Dunton is the Senior Vice President of Research and Development of Purdue Pharma L.P., a privately-held pharmaceutical company headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut. Dr. Dunton was the principal owner of Danerius, LLC, a biotechnology consulting company which he founded in 2006 until 2015. From January 2007 until March 2009, Dr. Dunton served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Panacos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. He was the non-Executive Chairman and Director of EpiCept, Inc. (OTC MKTS: EPCT) a public biotechnology company developing products for cancer, pain and inflammatory conditions. In addition to Oragenics, he is currently a Director of the public biotechnology company, and Palatin, Inc. (AMEX: PTN). He previously served as a Director of Sancilio and Company, MediciNova and Targacept, Inc. In 2005, Dr. Dunton served as the Non-Executive Chairman of the board of directors of ActivBiotics, Inc., a privately held biopharmaceutical company. Previously, he was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Metaphore Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2003 until 2006, when it merged with ActivBiotics. From 2004 until

6

Table of Contents

2005, Dr. Dunton served as a member of the board of directors of Vicuron Pharmaceuticals until it was acquired by Pfizer, Inc. In 2002, Dr. Dunton served as President, Chief Operating Officer and a director of Emisphere Technologies, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. From 1994 to 2001, Dr. Dunton was a senior executive in various capacities in the Pharmaceuticals Group of Johnson & Johnson. From 1999 to 2001, Dr. Dunton was President and Managing Director of The Janssen Research Foundation, a Johnson & Johnson company. From 1998 to 1999, he served as Group Vice President of Global Clinical Research and Development of Janssen. Prior to joining Janssen, Dr. Dunton was Vice President of Global Clinical Research and Development at the R.W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, also a Johnson & Johnson company. Prior to joining Johnson & Johnson, Dr. Dunton held positions in clinical research and development at Syntex Corporation, CIBA-GEIGY Corporation and Hoffmann La Roche Inc. Dr. Dunton holds a MD degree from New York University School of Medicine, where he completed his residency in internal medicine. He also was a Fellow in Clinical Pharmacology at the New York Hospital/Cornell University Medical Center.

Dr. Dunton brings to our Board a significant depth of experience in the pharmaceutical industry that will be invaluable to the Company as we continue to develop our biotechnology assets.

See “Corporate Governance” below for additional information regarding the Board.

7

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL II

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary

At our 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, as provided in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank Act”) and as required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we provided our shareholders the opportunity to advise our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors regarding the compensation of our named executive officers as described in our proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“say on pay”). Our shareholders also were asked to indicate how frequently we should seek a “say on pay” advisory vote. The shareholders were able to indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation once every one, two, or three years. At the 2013 Meeting, 98.7% of shareholders voting or who abstained from voting endorsed our Board’s recommendation that the advisory “say on pay” vote be held every year. Therefore, we are providing our shareholders the opportunity to advise our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors regarding the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement.

As described in detail under the heading “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation programs are designed to attract and retain highly qualified leadership personnel, providing them attractive long-term career opportunities. Our compensation philosophy is to provide executives with a competitive total compensation package which motivates superior job performance, the achievement of our business objectives, and the enhancement of shareholder value. Rather than basing compensation on a series of specific performance objectives, we encourage initiative, teamwork and innovation, and each executive is enabled to use his or her abilities and particular area of responsibility to strengthen our overall performance. Please read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” of this Proxy Statement for a detailed description and analysis of our executive compensation programs, including information about the fiscal year 2016 compensation of our named executive officers.

It is the philosophy of the Board of Directors to align the interests of our executive officers and shareholders by integrating the executives’ compensation opportunities with our long-term corporate strategic and financial objectives. Our general approach to compensating executive officers is to pay cash salaries which generally are competitive within ranges of salaries paid to executives of other healthcare companies, particularly those of similar size and those in our geographic areas. Our compensation committee sets overall compensation at a level it believes to be fair, based upon a subjective analysis of the individual executive’s experience and past and potential contributions to us.

We are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. We will ask our shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Meeting.

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation and the accompanying narrative disclosure set forth in the Company’s 2016 Proxy Statement.”

This say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or our Board. Our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider the outcome of the vote when making future executive compensation decisions.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE

APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL II, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

8

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL III

RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF MAYER HOFFMAN MCCANN P.C.

AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Summary

Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. served as the Company’s independent auditors and independent registered public accounting firm for the completion of the Company’s audit for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Audit Committee has again approved the appointment of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. as the Company’s independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2017 and the Board has further directed that the Company submit the selection of independent auditors and independent registered public accounting firm for 2017 for ratification by the shareholders at this shareholder meeting.

Representatives of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., who are expected to be present at the shareholder meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Although ratification is not required by the Bylaws or otherwise, the Company is submitting the selection to its shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice and because the Company values its shareholders’ views. In the event the shareholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different auditor/independent accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee feels that such a change would be in the Company’s and the Company’s shareholders’ best interests.

Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. leases substantially all of its personnel, who work under the control of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. shareholders, from wholly owned subsidiaries of CBIZ, Inc., in an alternative practice structure.

Independent Auditors’ Fees and Services

The following table provides the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the Company’s principal accountants, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. (“MHM”), in the categories indicated during each of the past two fiscal years ended December 31:

9

Table of Contents

Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee approves in advance all audit and non-audit services to be performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee considers whether the provision of any proposed non-audit services is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence and has pre-approved certain specified audit and non-audit services to be provided by MHM for up to twelve (12) months from the date of the pre-approval. If there are any additional services to be provided, a request for pre-approval must be submitted by management to the Audit Committee for its consideration.

Vote Required and Board of Directors’ Recommendation

Ratification of the selection of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. as the Company’s independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2017 requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock voting on this Proposal III in person, or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will not be counted in the ratification of the selection of independent auditors and will have no effect on the outcome of the selection of the independent auditors.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE

RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF MAYER HOFFMAN MCCANN P.C. AS THE COMPANY’S

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS.

10

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL IV

APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES AVAILABLE FOR ISSUANCE UNDER THE 2012 INCENTIVE PLAN BY 1,500,000 SHARES

Summary

We are asking our shareholders to approve an amendment to our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Incentive Plan”) to increase the shares authorized to be issued thereunder by 1,500,000 shares from 4,000,000 to 5,500,000.

In October of 2012 our shareholders approved the amendment, restatement and retitling of our prior stock option and incentive plan, as amended, to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Incentive Plan”) currently in place. In addition, at that time, our shareholders also approved an amendment to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder from 1,125,000 to 4,000,000 shares.

On March 16, 2017, our board of directors approved an amendment to the 2012 Incentive Plan, increasing the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2012 Incentive Plan by 1,500,000 shares from 4,000,000 to 5,500,000 (the “Amendment”) shares and recommended that the Amendment be submitted to our shareholders for their approval. A copy of the Amendment is attached hereto as Appendix A.

In reviewing our compensation practices, including in light of various evolving market practices, as well as to enhance the Company’s flexibility to make awards, our board of directors determined to make the above change to the 2012 Incentive Plan. In addition, the proposed amendment increasing the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2012 Incentive Plan ensures our ability to continue to grant stock options and other awards, which are vital to our ability to attract and retain outstanding and highly skilled individuals in the extremely competitive labor markets in which we must compete. Our employees are our most valuable asset, and such awards are crucial to our ability to motivate individuals in our service to achieve our goals. We believe strongly that the approval of the Amendment to our 2012 Incentive Plan, as proposed, is instrumental to our continued success.

In addition, shareholder approval of the Amendment is intended to satisfy the shareholder approval requirements under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, so as to permit us to deduct under federal income tax law certain amounts paid under the 2012 Incentive Plan to executive officers that might otherwise not be deductible.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally prevents public companies from deducting compensation paid in excess of $1,000,000 to any one of certain of their executive officers during any single year. Under current law, this restriction applies to compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and our other three most highly compensated executive officers listed in our “Summary Compensation Table” in this proxy statement. Certain “performance-based compensation” is specifically exempted from this deduction limit if it otherwise meets the requirements of Section 162(m).

Stock options and stock appreciation rights that are structured such that the recipient’s compensation is based solely on the appreciation of the value of the underlying shares from the date of grant until the date of exercise may qualify as performance-based compensation if, among other requirements, the plan under which the awards are granted is shareholder-approved and contains a limit on the number of shares that may be granted under options or stock appreciation rights to any one individual during a specified period. As a result, the 2012 Incentive Plan provides that for Section 162(m) purposes no participant may be granted awards, other than cash awards, in any one fiscal year that, in the aggregate, cover more than 1,000,000 shares.

Additional requirements apply to certain other forms of compensation, such as cash awards and restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, in order for them to qualify as performance-based compensation, including a requirement that payment under the awards be contingent upon the achievement of certain performance goals that are established in a manner specified under Section 162(m). As a result, the 2012 Incentive Plan permits us to issue certain awards that incorporate performance goals and provides that these performance goals may be based upon: annual revenue, cash position, earnings per share, individual objectives, net income, operating cash flow, operating income, return on assets, return on equity, return on sales and total shareholder return. The performance goals must be established and approved by the Committee during the first 90 days of the performance period (and, in the case of performance periods of less than one year, in no event after 25% or more of the performance period has elapsed) and while performance relating to such targets remains substantially uncertain.

11

Table of Contents

The following table presents the shares covered by the options contemplated to be awarded under the 2012 Incentive Plan, to our named executive officers and to our non-employee directors pursuant to the terms of our current Director Compensation Program.

New Plan Amendment Benefits

2012 Incentive Plan

Other than the awards described for our named executive officers and our non-employee directors, the number, amount and type of awards to be received by or allocated to eligible persons under the 2012 Incentive Plan cannot be determined at this time. The Company is not currently considering any specific additional awards under the 2012 Incentive Plan other than as reflected in the table. For information regarding options and restricted stock awards granted to executive officers of the Company during fiscal 2016, see the information provided under the heading “Executive Compensation” in this proxy statement.

Vote Required and Board of Directors’ Recommendation

Approval of the Amendment to the 2012 Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock that are voting on this Proposal IV in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. In the event the shareholders fail to approve the Amendment to the 2012 Incentive Plan, the existing 2012 Incentive Plan will continue in operation pursuant to its terms. Even if the Amendment to the 2012 Incentive Plan is approved, the board of directors may, pursuant to the terms of the 2012 Incentive Plan and subject to any applicable exchange where the Company may be listed, make any other changes to the 2012 Incentive Plan that it feels would be in our and our shareholders’ best interests.

Because each of our directors and executive officers are eligible to participate in the 2012 Incentive Plan, the approval of the Amendment to the 2012 Incentive Plan impacts each of our directors and executive officers and thus each of our directors and executive officers has a personal interest in this proposal and its approval by our shareholders.

12

Table of Contents

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 2012 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN.

Summary of the 2012 Incentive Plan

The following is a summary of the principal features of the 2012 Incentive Plan and its operation. Because it is not a complete description of all of the terms and conditions of the 2012 Incentive Plan, the summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2012 Incentive Plan, as previously filed by us in Form 8-K on October 25, 2012.

Background and Purpose of the 2012 Incentive Plan

The 2012 Incentive Plan is intended to continue to attract, motivate and retain employees, consultants and non-employee directors and to encourage their stock ownership in the Company thereby aligning their interests with those of the Company’s shareholders. The increase in authorized shares contemplated by the Amendment to the 2012 Incentive Plan would enable the Company to continue to be able to make awards thereunder. The Amendment to the 2012 Incentive Plan will also permit the Company to continue to make awards of incentive stock options to eligible employees.

The purpose of the 2012 Incentive Plan is to give the Company a competitive advantage in attracting, retaining and motivating officers, employees, non-employee Directors, and consultants, and to provide the Company with a stock plan that could provide incentives linked to the financial results of the Company’s business and to increases in shareholder value.

Types of Awards Granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan

The 2012 Incentive Plan permits the grant of the following types of incentive awards: (1) stock options, including incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options, (2) stock appreciation rights, (3) restricted stock, (4) restricted stock units and (5) cash awards (each, an “Award”).

Administration of the 2012 Incentive Plan

The Board is authorized to appoint a committee of at least two non-employee members of the Board (the “Committee”) to administer the 2012 Incentive Plan. To make grants to certain of the Company’s officers and key employees, the members of this Committee must qualify as “non-employee directors” under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and as “outside directors” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (so that the Company can receive a federal tax deduction for certain compensation paid under the 2012 Incentive Plan). The Board has delegated general administrative authority for the 2012 Incentive Plan to the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”).

Subject to the terms of the 2012 Incentive Plan, the Committee has the discretion to select the employees, consultants and directors who will receive Awards, to determine the terms and conditions of such Awards (for example, the number of shares subject to an Award, the exercise price, and vesting schedule), to interpret the provisions of the 2012 Incentive Plan and outstanding Awards, to amend outstanding Awards (including the authority to accelerate vesting), to extend an option’s post-termination exercise period (but not beyond the original option term), and to adopt, interpret, amend or revoke rules for the administration, interpretation and application of the 2012 Incentive Plan.

Except to the extent the Board has reserved the authority to review and approve grants to named executive officers or to approve and ratify other actions of the Committee, the Committee may delegate any part of its authority and powers under the 2012 Incentive Plan to one or more of the Company’s directors and/or officers, but only the Committee itself can make Awards to participants who are the Company’s executive officers. References to the Committee in this proposal include the Committee and any directors or officers to whom the Committee properly delegates authority.

Authorized Shares

The aggregate number of shares of our common stock currently authorized pursuant to the 2012 Incentive

13

Table of Contents

Plan is 4,000,000 shares. As of March 21, 2017, 2,247,462 shares of common stock had been issued under the 2012 Incentive Plan, of which 2,205,929 were issued pursuant to restricted stock awards and 41,533 shares were issued pursuant to option exercises. Options covering an additional 1,621,523 shares granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan remain outstanding. A total of 131,015 shares of common stock remain available for future awards under the 2012 Incentive Plan (plus shares subject to outstanding awards that might in the future be returned to the 2012 Incentive Plan as a result of cancellations or expirations of awards). As of March 21, 2017, options outstanding under the 2012 Incentive Plan have per share exercise prices ranging from $0.55 to $10.40 or a weighted average per share exercise price of $1.05.

If the proposed amendment to the 2012 Incentive Plan is approved, the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock that currently may be issued pursuant to Awards under the 2012 Incentive Plan will be 5,500,000 shares and

If an Award is settled in cash, or is cancelled, terminates, expires, or lapses for any reason (with the exception of the termination of a tandem stock appreciation right upon exercise of the related option, or the termination of a related option upon exercise of the corresponding tandem stock appreciation right), any shares subject to such Award again shall be available for subsequent Awards under the 2012 Incentive Plan. Shares that are exchanged by a participant or withheld by the Company as full or partial payment in connection with any Award under the 2012 Incentive Plan, as well as any shares exchanged by a participant or withheld by the Company or one of its affiliates to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any Award, shall not be available for subsequent Awards under the 2012 Incentive Plan. To the extent that shares are delivered pursuant to the exercise of a stock appreciation right or option granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan, the number of underlying shares as to which the exercise related shall be counted against the applicable share limits above, as opposed to only counting the shares issued. (For purposes of clarity, if a stock appreciation right relates to 100,000 shares and is exercised at a time when the payment due to the participant is 15,000 shares, 100,000 shares shall be charged against the applicable share limits under the 2012 Incentive Plan with respect to such exercise.)

In the event that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, the Company’s common stock, other securities, or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or exchange of the Company’s common stock or other securities, or other change in the Company’s corporate structure affecting the Company’s common stock occurs such that an adjustment is determined by the Committee (in its sole discretion) to be appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the 2012 Incentive Plan, the Committee shall, in such manner as it may deem equitable, (a) adjust the number and class of shares (or other securities) available for issuance under the 2012 Incentive Plan and the number, class, and price of shares (or other securities) subject to outstanding Awards or (b) make provision for a cash payment or for the assumption, substitution or exchange of any or all outstanding Awards or the cash, securities or property deliverable to the holder of any or all outstanding Awards, based upon the distribution or consideration payable to holders of the Company’s common stock upon or in respect of such event.

Eligibility to Receive Awards

The Committee selects the employees (including executive officers), consultants and directors who will be granted Awards under the 2012 Incentive Plan. As of March 21, 2017, the Company had fourteen (14) officers and employees, including all of the Company’s named executive officers who are still serving in that capacity as of March 21, 2017, and four non-employee directors who were eligible to receive Awards under the 2012 Incentive Plan. The actual number of individuals who will receive an Award under the 2012 Incentive Plan cannot be determined in advance because the Committee has the discretion to select the participants.

14

Table of Contents

Stock Options

A stock option is the right to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed exercise price for a fixed period of time. Under the 2012 Incentive Plan, the Committee may grant nonqualified stock options and/or incentive stock options. The Committee will determine the number of shares covered by each option.

The exercise price of the shares subject to each option is set by the Committee but generally cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of grant. In addition, the exercise price of an incentive stock option must be at least 110% of fair market value (on the grant date) if the participant owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of the Company’s stock and any of the Company’s subsidiaries. However, the Company may grant certain options with exercise prices equal to less than the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant in connection with its acquisition of another company. The fair market value of the Company’s common stock is generally the last quoted sales price for the shares traded on NYSE MKT on the applicable date.

As of March 14, 2017, the closing price of our common stock was $0.49 per share. The aggregate fair market value of the shares (determined on the grant date) covered by incentive stock options which first become exercisable by any participant during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000. Any shares in excess of this limit will be treated as subject to a nonqualified stock option. If the employee holds more than one incentive stock option, the incentive stock options are considered in the order in which they were granted.

An option granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan cannot generally be exercised until it becomes vested. The Committee establishes the vesting schedule of each option at the time of grant. The Committee may, in its discretion, condition the vesting of any option granted under the Plan on satisfaction of (i) any minimum period of continued employment or other continued service with the Company the Committee deems appropriate, or (ii) satisfaction of one or more performance goals the Committee deems appropriate, or (iii) a combination of service vesting and satisfaction of performance goals set by the Committee. After an option is granted, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, modify or accelerate the vesting of the option.

Options vest and become exercisable at the times and on the terms established by the Committee at the time of grant. Options granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan expire at the times established by the Committee, but not later than 10 years after the grant date (such term is limited to five years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a participant who owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of the Company’s stock and any of the Company’s subsidiaries). The Committee may determine the effect of termination of employment or service on the rights and benefits under options and in doing so may make distinctions based upon the cause of termination or other factors.

The exercise price of each option granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan must be paid in full in cash or its equivalent at the time of exercise. The Committee also may permit payment through the tender of shares that are already owned by the participant, or by any other form of legally permissible consolidation which the Committee determines to be consistent with the purpose of the 2012 Incentive Plan.

Stock Appreciation Rights

Awards of stock appreciation rights may be granted in tandem with or in connection to all or any part of an option, either concurrently with the grant of an option or at any time thereafter during the term of the option, or may be granted independently of options. The Committee has complete discretion to determine the number of stock appreciation rights granted to any employee, consultant or director.

The Committee determines the terms of stock appreciation rights, except that the exercise price of a stock appreciation right that is granted independently of an option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant and the exercise price of a stock appreciation right that is granted in tandem with or in connection to an option may not be less than the exercise price of the related option. In addition, the Committee may determine the effect of termination of employment or service on the rights and benefits under stock appreciation rights and in doing so may make distinctions based upon the cause of termination or other factors.

A stock appreciation right granted in tandem with an option will entitle the participant to exercise the stock appreciation right by surrendering to the Company a portion of the unexercised related option. The participant will

15

Table of Contents

receive in exchange from the Company an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise of the stock appreciation right covered by the surrendered portion of the related option over the exercise price of the shares covered by the surrendered portion of the related option. When a stock appreciation right granted in tandem with an option is exercised, the related option, to the extent surrendered, will cease to be exercisable. A stock appreciation right granted in connection with an option will be exercisable until, and will expire no later than, the date on which the related option ceases to be exercisable or expires. A stock appreciation right granted in connection with an option will automatically be deemed exercised after the related option is exercised.

Stock appreciation rights may also be granted independently of options. Such a stock appreciation right will entitle the participant, upon exercise, to receive from the Company an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price. A stock appreciation right granted without a related option will be exercisable, in whole or in part, at such time as the Committee will specify in the stock appreciation right agreement. Stock appreciation rights granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan expire at the times established by the Committee, but not later than ten years after the date of grant.

The Company’s obligation arising upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right may be paid in shares, in cash, or any combination thereof, as the Committee may determine.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

Awards of restricted stock are shares that vest in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Committee. Restricted stock units represent a promise to deliver shares of the Company’s common stock, or an amount of cash or property equal to the underlying shares, at a future date. The Committee will determine the number of shares subject to a restricted stock Award or restricted stock unit Award granted to any employee, consultant or director, and the other terms of the Award (including the purchase price, if any, and transfer restrictions).

In determining whether an Award of restricted stock or restricted stock units should be made, and/or the vesting schedule for any such Award, the Committee may impose whatever conditions to vesting as it determines to be appropriate or determine that fully-vested shares should be awarded. The Committee may, in its discretion, condition the vesting of any restricted stock or restricted stock units granted under the Plan on satisfaction of (i) any minimum period of continued employment or other continued service with the Company the Committee deems appropriate, or (ii) satisfaction of one or more performance goals the Committee deems appropriate, or (iii) a combination of service vesting and satisfaction of performance goals set by the Committee. For example, the Committee may determine to grant an Award of restricted stock or restricted stock units that will vest only if the participant continues employment and certain performance goals established by the Committee are satisfied.

The Committee may also provide that Awards of restricted stock or restricted stock units include rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents based on the amount of dividends paid on outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, provided that as to any dividend equivalent rights granted in connection with an Award granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan that is subject to performance-based vesting requirements, no dividend equivalent payment will be made unless the related performance-based vesting conditions of the Award are satisfied (or, in the case of a restricted stock or similar Award where the dividend must be paid as a matter of law, the dividend payment will be subject to forfeiture or repayment, as the case may be, if the related performance-based vesting conditions are not satisfied).

Cash Awards

Cash awards may be granted either alone, in addition to, or in tandem with other Awards granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan. After the Committee determines that it will offer a cash award, it shall advise the participant, by means of an award agreement, of the terms, conditions and restrictions related to the cash award. The grant or vesting of a cash award may be made contingent on the achievement of performance goals established by the Committee. Nothing in the 2012 Incentive Plan prevents the Company from granting cash awards outside of the 2012 Incentive Plan in any amount to any employee or other service provider.

Performance Goals

Awards under the 2012 Incentive Plan may be made subject to performance conditions as well as time-vesting conditions. Awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under

16

Table of Contents

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code may include performance conditions that are established and administered in accordance with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and based on an objective formula or standard utilizing one or more of the following factors and any objectively verifiable adjustment(s) thereto permitted and pre-established by the Committee in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code: annual revenue, cash position, earnings per share, individual objectives, net income, operating cash flow, operating income, regulatory approvals, return on assets, return on investment, return on sales, stock price and total shareholder return. Performance goals may differ from participant to participant and from Award to Award.

Change of Control

In the event of a “change of control” of the Company, the Committee may provide for the successor corporation to either assume or provide a substitute award for each outstanding stock option and stock appreciation right. If the successor corporation assumes or provides a replacement Award and the participant is terminated by the successor corporation for reasons other than “misconduct” during the 12-month period following the change of control, then such participant’s options and stock appreciation rights will immediately vest and become exercisable as to all of the shares subject to such Award.

Additionally, in the event of a “change of control” of the Company, the Committee may provide for any vesting conditions or Company repurchase or reacquisition rights with respect to restricted stock and restricted stock units to be assigned to the successor corporation. In the event the successor corporation refuses to assume any such vesting conditions or repurchase or reacquisition rights, such vesting conditions or repurchase or reacquisition rights will lapse and the participant will be fully vested in such shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units. If the vesting conditions or repurchase or reacquisition rights are assigned to the successor corporation and the participant is terminated by the successor corporation for reasons other than “misconduct” during the 12-month period following such change of control, then any vesting conditions or repurchase or reacquisition rights will lapse with respect to such participant’s restricted stock and restricted stock units (or the property for which the restricted stock and restricted stock units were converted upon the change of control) and the participant will be fully vested in such restricted stock and restricted stock units (or the property for which the restricted stock and restricted stock units were converted upon the change of control). The Committee may also provide in the Award agreement or other agreements that one or more Awards will be subject to different vesting rules than those described above in connection with a change of control of the Company.

In the event the successor corporation refuses to assume the outstanding stock option or SAR awards, or to provide substitute awards, the Committee may notify affected participants that the options or stock appreciation rights under the 2012 Incentive Plan will immediately vest and become exercisable as to all of the shares subject to such Award in connection with the transaction, and, in the Committee’s discretion, provide that any stock options and stock appreciation rights which have not been exercised by the effective date may be cancelled in exchange for the right to receive a cash payment from the Company equal to the excess of the value of the transaction consideration to be paid to shareholders over the exercise price for the option or stock appreciation rights, and that such options and stock appreciation rights will terminate upon the completion of the change of control and receipt of such cash payments. Similarly, if the successor corporation refuses to assume outstanding restricted stock units or provide substitute awards, the Committee may provide that any outstanding restricted stock units be cancelled in exchange for the right to receive a cash payment from the Company equal to the excess of the value of the transaction consideration to be paid to shareholders in the transaction.

The Committee may provide for cash awards to be assumed or an equivalent cash award substituted by the successor corporation in the event of a “change of control.” In the event that the successor corporation refuses to assume or substitute for the cash award, the participant will become fully vested in the cash award. If the cash award is assumed or substituted for and within 12 months following the “change of control” the participant is terminated by the successor corporation for reasons other than “misconduct,” the participant will become fully vested in the cash award.

Limited Transferability of Awards

Awards granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan generally may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the applicable laws of descent and distribution. However, participants may, in a manner specified by the Committee, transfer nonqualified stock options (a) pursuant to a court-approved domestic relations order relating to child support, alimony payments or marital property rights and

17

Table of Contents

(b) by bona fide gift to (1) a member of the participant’s immediate family; (2) a trust or other entity for the sole benefit of the participant and/or his or her immediate family; (3) a partnership, limited liability company or other entity whose members are the participant and/or his or her immediate family; or (4) certain limited tax-qualified charities.

Amendment and Termination of the 2012 Incentive Plan

The Board generally may amend, suspend or terminate the 2012 Incentive Plan at any time and for any reason (subject to shareholder consent as may be required by applicable law). However, no amendment or termination of the 2012 Incentive Plan may alter or impair the rights of a participant with respect to an outstanding Award without his or her consent; provided that such consent shall not be required if the Board determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that the amendment, suspension or termination (a) is required or advisable in order for the Company, the 2012 Incentive Plan or the Award to satisfy applicable law, to meet the requirements of any accounting standard or to avoid any adverse accounting treatment, or (b) in connection with any change of control event, is in the best interests of the Company or its shareholders.

Unless terminated by the Board, the 2012 Incentive Plan does not have a term. However, no incentive stock option may be granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan after ten years from the latest date the Company’s shareholders approve the 2012 Incentive Plan, including any subsequent amendment or restatement of the 2012 Incentive Plan approved by the Company’s shareholders. Further, for awards to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Code Section 162(m), the Company’s shareholders must re-approve the material terms of the performance goals used under the 2012 Incentive Plan at least once every five years. Outstanding Awards generally will continue following the expiration or termination of the 2012 Incentive Plan until they expire pursuant to the terms of such Awards.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a brief summary of the general federal income tax consequences to U.S. taxpayers and the Company with respect to the grant, vesting and exercise of Awards granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan. This summary does not purport to be complete and does not discuss the tax consequences of a participant’s death, the tax consequences of an Award that is subject to but does not satisfy the deferred compensation rules of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, or the tax laws of any locality, state or foreign country in which the participant may reside. Tax consequences for any particular individual may be different.

Nonqualified Stock Options. No taxable income is recognized when a nonqualified stock option is granted to a participant. Upon exercise of a nonqualified stock option with respect to vested shares, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value (on the exercise date) of the shares purchased over the exercise price of the option. Any taxable income recognized in connection with exercise of a nonqualified stock option would be added to the tax basis of the shares and, with respect to an employee, is subject to tax withholding by the Company. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares would be either long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long the stock was held.

Incentive Stock Options. No taxable income is recognized when an incentive stock option is granted or exercised, although the excess (if any) of the fair market value of the shares at exercise over the exercise price paid is treated as an item of income for alternative minimum tax purposes in the year of the exercise, and may subject the participant to alternative minimum tax. Alternative minimum tax is an alternative method of calculating the income tax that must be paid each year, which includes certain additional items of income and tax preferences and disallows or limits certain deductions otherwise allowable for regular tax purposes. Alternative minimum tax is payable only to the extent that the alternative minimum tax exceeds “ordinary” federal income tax for the year (computed without regard to certain credits and special taxes).

If the participant exercises the incentive stock option and then later sells or otherwise disposes of the shares more than two years after the grant date and more than one year after the exercise date, the difference between the sale price and the exercise price will be taxed as long-term capital gain or loss. If the participant exercises the option and then later sells or otherwise disposes of the shares before the end of the two- or one-year holding periods described above, (a) if the sale price exceeds the exercise price, he or she generally will have ordinary income at the time of the sale equal to the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date (or the sale price, if less) minus the exercise price of the option, and the excess (if any) between the sales price and the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date will be taxed as capital gain or (b) if the sale price is less than the exercise price, the participant will recognize a capital loss equal to the difference between the exercise price and the sale price.

18

Table of Contents

In the case of both nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options, special federal income tax rules apply if the Company’s common stock is used to pay all or part of the option exercise price, and different rules than those described above will apply if unvested shares are purchased on exercise of the option.

Stock Appreciation Rights. No taxable income is recognized when a stock appreciation right is granted to a participant. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation right, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the amount of cash received and the fair market value of any shares received by the participant as of the payment date. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares would be either long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long the stock was held.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. No taxable income is generally recognized when restricted stock or restricted stock units are granted to a participant if the shares are subject to vesting requirements. Upon vesting (or at grant as to any shares that are vested at grant), the participant will generally recognize income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares over any amount the participant paid for the shares.

A participant who receives unvested shares of restricted stock under a stock Award may make an election under Section 83(b) of the Code at the time of transfer of the shares to recognize income based upon the fair market value of the stock on the date of transfer. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares would be either long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long the stock was held.

The ordinary income on an Award of restricted stock or restricted stock units recognized by an employee will be subject to tax withholding by the Company.

Cash Awards. Upon receipt of cash, the recipient will have taxable ordinary income, in the year of receipt, equal to the cash received. Any cash received by an employee will be subject to tax withholding by the Company.

Tax Effect for the Company. The Company generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with an Award under the 2012 Incentive Plan in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by a participant at the time the participant recognizes such income (for example, upon the exercise of a nonqualified stock option). Special rules limit the deductibility of compensation paid to the chief executive officer and to certain of the Company’s other executive officers. If compensation attributable to Awards to such individuals is not “performance-based” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company may not be permitted to deduct compensation paid to such individuals to the extent that aggregate non-performance-based compensation exceeds $1,000,000 per individual in any tax year. Furthermore, if an Award is accelerated under the 2012 Incentive Plan in connection with a “change in control” (as this term is used under the Internal Revenue Code), the Company may not be permitted to deduct the portion of the compensation attributable to the acceleration (“parachute payments”) if it exceeds certain threshold limits under the Internal Revenue Code (and certain related excise taxes may be triggered).

Accounting Treatment

The Company will recognize compensation expense in connection with Awards granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan as required under applicable accounting standards. The Company currently amortizes compensation expense associated with equity Awards over an Award’s requisite service period and establishes the fair value of equity Awards in accordance with applicable accounting standards.

19

Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference in such filing.

The following is the report of the Audit Committee with respect to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, and the notes thereto.

Review with Management

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and the notes thereto. Management represented to the Audit Committee that our financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Review and Discussions with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee discussed with Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard 1301, which includes, among other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of our financial statements.

The Audit Committee also received and reviewed written disclosures and the letter from Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. as required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and has discussed with Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. their independence from us.

Conclusion

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Submitted by the Audit Committee:

Charles L. Pope (Chair)

Dr. Frederick W. Telling

Dr. Alan Dunton

20

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Oragenics’ current corporate governance practices and policies are designed to promote shareholder value, and Oragenics is committed to the highest standards of corporate ethics and diligent compliance with financial accounting and reporting rules. Our Board provides independent leadership in the exercise of its responsibilities. Our management oversees a system of internal controls and compliance with corporate policies and applicable laws and regulations, and our employees operate in a climate of responsibility, candor and integrity. You can access information regarding our corporate governance practices on our web site at www.oragenics.com/governance.html

Corporate Governance Principles

Our Board has adopted Board of Directors Corporate Governance Policy, which sets forth the principles that guide the Board’s exercise of its responsibility to oversee corporate governance, maintain its independence, evaluate its own performance and the performance of our executive officers and set corporate strategy. Our Corporate Governance Policy, states that currently different individuals fill the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Our Board first adopted these Corporate Governance Principles in December 2009 and may refine them from time to time. You can access our Corporate Governance Principles on our web site at www.oragenics.com/governance.html.

Code of Ethics/Standards of Business Conduct

It is our policy to conduct our operations in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and to operate our business under the fundamental principles of honesty, integrity and ethical behavior. This policy can be found in our Company Operating Principles, which is applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees, and which complies with the SEC’s requirements and with listing standards of the NYSE MKT we have adopted.

Our Company Operating Principles are designed to promote honest and ethical conduct and compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and to deter wrongdoing. Our Company Operating Principles are also aimed at ensuring that information we provide to the public (including our filings with and submissions to the SEC) is accurate, complete, fair, relevant, timely and understandable. Our Company Operating Principles can be accessed on our web site at www.oragenics.com/governance. We intend to disclose amendments to certain provisions of our Company Operating Principles, or waivers of such provisions granted to directors and executive officers, on our web site in accordance with applicable SEC requirements.

Independence of Directors

Our common stock is listed on a national securities exchange, the NYSE MKT. Accordingly, in determining whether our Directors are independent, we are required to comply with the rules of the NYSE MKT. We also expect to continue to comply with securities and other laws and regulations regarding the independence of directors, including those adopted under Section 301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Rule 10A-3 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to the independence of Audit Committee members. The NYSE MKT listing standards define an “independent director” generally as a person, other than an officer of a company, who does not, in the view of the company’s Board of Directors, have a relationship with the company that would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment. As of June 24, 2016, the Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that each of the following directors, constituting a majority of the Board, is independent within the meaning of the NYSE MKT listing standards:

Dr. Frederick W. Telling

Charles L. Pope

Dr. Alan Dunton

As of June 24, 2016 the Board of Directors also determined that Robert Koski was no longer independent as a result of the consumer probiotic transaction with Christine Koski, his sister and former director. Such independence definition includes a series of objective tests, including that the director is not an executive officer or employee and has not engaged in various types of business dealings with us. In addition, as further required by the NYSE MKT listing

21

Table of Contents

standards, the Board has made a subjective determination as to each independent director that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Board Leadership Structure

We currently separate the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Since February 2011, Dr. Telling, one of our independent directors, has served as our non-executive Chairman of the Board. The responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board include: setting the agenda for each Board meeting, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer; presiding at executive sessions; facilitating and conducting, with the Nominating Committee, the annual self-assessments by the Board and each standing committee of the Board, including periodic performance reviews of individual directors; and conducting, with the Compensation Committee, a formal evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers in the context of the annual compensation review.

Separating the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on our day-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman of the Board to lead the Board in its fundamental role of providing advice to and independent oversight of management. The Board believes that having an independent director serve as Chairman of the Board is the appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time and demonstrates our commitment to good corporate governance.

In addition, as described in more detail below, our Board has three standing committees, each chairman and each member of which is an independent director. Our Board delegates substantial responsibility to each Board committee, which reports their activities and actions back to the Board. We believe that our independent Board committees and their chairmen are an important aspect of our Board leadership structure.

Risk Oversight

Our Board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. With the oversight of our Board, our officers are responsible for the day-to-day management of the material risks Oragenics faces. In its oversight role, our Board has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed. The involvement of the Board in setting our business strategy at least annually is a key part of its oversight of risk management, its assessment of management’s appetite for risk and its determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for Oragenics. The Board regularly receives updates from management and outside advisors regarding certain risks the Company faces, including potential litigation and various operating risks.

In addition, our Board committees each oversee certain aspects of risk management. For example, our Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing risk management of financial matters, financial reporting, the adequacy of our risk-related internal controls, and internal investigations; our Compensation Committee oversees risks related to compensation policies and practices; and our Nominating Committee oversees governance related risks, such as Board independence and conflicts of interest, as well as management and director succession planning. Our Board committees report their findings to the Board.

Senior management attends Board and Board committee meetings and is available to address any questions or concerns raised by the Board on risk management-related and any other matters. The Board holds periodic strategic planning sessions with senior management to discuss strategies, key challenges, and risks and opportunities for the Company.

Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees

Board of Directors. Our property, affairs and business are under the general management of our Board of Directors as provided by the laws of the State of Florida and our Bylaws. The Board of Directors conducts its business through meetings of the full Board and through committees of the Board. The Board of Directors has appointed standing Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees of the Board of Directors. The Board periodically reviews the size of the Board and recommends any changes it determines to be appropriate given our needs. Under our Bylaws, the number of members on the Board may be increased or decreased by resolution of the Board.

22

Table of Contents

The Board currently consists of five members. The Board has no formal policy regarding board member attendance at the Annual Meeting. All of our existing Directors attended the prior year’s annual meeting and all of our Directors are expected to attend the current Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors met or unanimously consented to resolutions twelve times during the year ended December 31, 2016 (“Fiscal 2016”). All Directors, with the exception of Dr. Dunton, attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees during Fiscal 2016. In conjunction with regularly scheduled meetings, our “independent” Directors met in separate executive sessions.

Audit Committee: The Audit Committee members currently consist of Mr. Charles Pope, Dr. Frederick Telling and Dr. Alan Dunton with Mr. Pope serving as Chairman. The Board has affirmatively determined that each such person met the independence requirements for audit committee purposes based on the more stringent independence standards imposed by applicable NYSE MKT and SEC rules. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Pope is an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. In March 2004, the Audit Committee adopted a written charter which was modified on April 24, 2007 and on December 29, 2009. The Company believes that its Audit Committee Charter complies with the requirements related to Sarbanes-Oxley and a current copy of the Audit Committee Charter is available on our website at www.oragenics.com. The Audit Committee met unanimously or consented to resolutions six times during Fiscal 2016.

The Audit Committee has the sole authority to engage and discharge, review the independence, qualifications, activities and compensation of the Company’s independent registered certified public accountants. The Audit Committee reports to the Board the appointment of the independent registered certified public accountants. The Audit Committee must assure regular rotation of the lead and concurring audit partners. The Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of the Company’s financial policies, control procedures, accounting staff, and reviews and approves the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee is responsible for the review of transactions between the Company and any Company officer, Director or entity in which a Company officer or Director has a material interest. The Audit Committee must develop and maintain procedures for the submission of complaints and concerns about accounting and auditing matters. The Audit Committee must assure CEO and CFO certifications meet their obligations by performing a review and evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. The Audit Committee has the authority to engage the services of an outside advisor when required. The Audit Committee must receive reports from the independent registered certified public accountants on critical accounting policies, significant accounting judgments and estimates, off-balance sheet transactions and non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles financial measures.

Compensation Committee: The Compensation Committee consists of directors Dr. Alan Dunton, Dr. Frederick Telling and Mr. Charles Pope with Dr. Dunton serving as Chairman. The Board has determined that each current member of the Compensation Committee meets the applicable requirements for independence. None of the Compensation Committee members has ever been an officer or employee of the Company. The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing the compensation of the Company’s Directors, Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers, including salaries, bonuses, severance arrangements, and other executive officer benefits. The Committee also administers the Company’s various incentive and stock option plans and designates both the persons receiving awards and the amounts and terms of the awards. The Compensation Committee adopted a charter in March 2004 to outline its compensation, benefits and management development philosophy and to communicate to shareholders the Company’s compensation policies and the reasoning behind such policies as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Charter was modified on April 24, 2007, on December 29, 2009 and again on June 6, 2013. A current copy of the compensation Committee charter is available on our website at www.oragenics.com. The Compensation Committee met four times during Fiscal 2016.

Nominating Committee: The Nominating Committee consists of directors Charles Pope, Dr. Alan Dunton and Dr. Frederick Telling with Mr. Pope serving as Chairman. The Board has determined that each current member of the Nominating Committee meets the applicable requirements for independence. The Nominating Committee met three times during Fiscal 2016. The Board adopted a nominating committee charter. The charter was updated on February 12, 2014. A current copy of the Nominating Committee’s charter is available on our website. In addition to recommending candidates to the Board for election at the Annual shareholder Meeting, the Nominating Committee oversees the evaluation of the board as a whole and its committees, as well as individual evaluations of those directors who are being considered for possible re-nomination to the board. The evaluation process occurs annually and has, to date, been informal.

23

Table of Contents

The Nominating Committee has not established specific minimum age, education, and years of business experience or specific types of skills for potential director candidates, but, in general, expects qualified candidates will have ample experience and a proven record of business success and leadership. The Nominating Committee also believes it is appropriate for a member of the Company’s management to participate as a member of the Board of Directors, although at present no such management member serves on the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee will consider as candidates for director individuals who possess a high level of ethics, integrity and values, and who are committed to representing the long-term interests of our shareholders. Such candidates must be able to make a significant contribution to the governance of the Company by virtue of their business and financial expertise, educational and professional background. The business discipline that may be sought at any given time will vary depending on the needs and strategic direction of the Company, and the disciplines represented by incumbent directors. In evaluating candidates for nomination as a director, the Nominating Committee will also consider other criteria, including geographical representation, independence, practical wisdom, mature judgment and having sufficient time to devote to the affairs of the Company in order to carry out the responsibilities of a director. One or more of our directors is required to possess the education or experience required to qualify as an audit committee financial expert as defined in the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Nominating Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, the Board of Directors and the Nominating Committee believe that it is essential that the members of the Board of Directors represent diverse viewpoints and a diverse mix of the specific criteria above. The entire Board of Directors is polled for suggestions as to individuals meeting the aforementioned criteria. Research may also be performed to identify qualified individuals. To date the Company has not engaged third parties to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying potential nominees.

Shareholder Recommendation of Nominees. The Board does not currently have a policy with regard to the consideration of any Director candidates recommended by security holders. Given the Company’s current size, stage of development, and size of the Board, the Board believes that it is not currently appropriate to establish a separate policy for security holders to submit such recommendations. Notwithstanding the lack of a formal policy regarding security holder nominations, the Board may from time to time consider candidates proposed for consideration for service on the Company’s Board by security holders. The Nominating Committee will consider qualified director nominees recommended by shareholders when such recommendations are submitted in accordance with applicable law, rule or regulation regarding director nominations. Shareholders may submit candidates for nomination to our Board of Directors by writing to: Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors, Oragenics, Inc., 4902 Eisenhower Blvd., Suite 125, Tampa, Florida 33634.

When submitting a nomination to us for consideration, a shareholder must provide certain information about each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election as a director, including: (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of the person; (ii) the principal occupation or employment of the person; (iii) the class or series and number of shares of our capital stock owned beneficially or of record by the person; and (iv) any other information relating to the person that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Such notice must be accompanied by the proposed nominee’s written consent to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. The Board has not set any specific minimum qualifications that must be met by a nominee presented for consideration to the Board by a security holder. A Board member may become aware of a potential nominee and present such nominee to the full Board for consideration at a Board meeting. The Board would evaluate the candidate and determine whether such person should be considered for Board service based on a variety of criteria including but not limited to, whether the individual has experience in the Company’s industry, potential conflicts, and the person’s ability to work with existing Board members and expected contributions. The Board would evaluate a nominee submitted by a security holder in the same or similar manner as one recommended by the Nominating Committee.

24

Table of Contents

Direct Shareholder Communication to Board Members

The Company does not currently have a formal process for direct security holder communications to the Board. The basis for the Board’s view that it is appropriate for the Company to not have such a formal process includes but is not limited to the following: the Company’s limited financial and personnel resources, the Company’s stage of operations and development and the ability for security holders to communicate with Board members informally.

Shareholders with questions about the Company are encouraged to contact the Company’s Corporate Secretary. However, if shareholders feel their questions have not been addressed, they may communicate with the Company’s Board of Directors by sending their communications to an individual director(s) or to the Company’s Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, Oragenics, Inc., 4902 Eisenhower Blvd., Suite 125, Tampa, Florida 33634. All shareholder communications received by the Company’s Corporate Secretary in this manner will be delivered to the individual director(s) or to the Company’s Board of Directors.

The Chairman of the Board of Directors, Dr. Frederick Telling, is an independent director and has been designated by the Board of Directors to preside at the executive sessions of the independent directors. If interested parties wish to make a concern known to the independent directors, they may do so in a writing addressed to the Chairman of the Board, Oragenics, Inc., 4902 Eisenhower Blvd., Suite 125, Tampa, Florida 33634.

Director Compensation

The Director Compensation program for 2016 consisted of the following:

Non-employee directors

Cash Compensation. The Director compensation program for 2016 provided that all non-employee Directors would receive an annual base fee for service on the Board of $45,000. In addition, the Chairperson of the Board and of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee would also receive annual fees of $40,000, $20,000, $15,000 and $10,000, respectively. All non-employee Directors serving on our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee (other than as the Chairperson) would receive an annual fee of $10,000, $7,500, and $5,000, respectively, in connection with such committee service. In addition, from time to time, the Board may establish special committees and in connection therewith determine the cash compensation that would be paid to the directors serving on a special committee at the time of the establishment of such committee. All fees for Board service are to be paid on or before the last business day of each quarter.

The Board is expecting to meet in-person for a minimum of six meetings each year. To the extent, the Board meets in excess of six in-person meetings an additional per meeting fee would also be considered to be paid to each director by the Board for such additional in-person meeting. To the extent the Board determines to establish a special committee or a special committee was previously established and continues to function, the Board would determine the cash compensation payable to each director serving on any such special committee.

Equity Compensation-New Director. Equity compensation is issued to Directors upon joining our Board. Non-employee Directors receive a stock option for the purchase of 5,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value per share on date they became a Director, which will immediately vest and be exercisable for ten years, subject to early termination under the terms of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).

Annual Equity Compensation Awards. On February 15, 2016, the Board approved as part of the Director Compensation Program (a) an annual stock option award to acquire 80,000 shares of our common stock for each director, and (b) annual award of 40,000 shares of restricted common stock for each director, vesting evenly over the four quarters of the year. These equity awards would be made under our Plan. Consistent with the foregoing, on February 15, 2016 the Board approved stock option awards in the amount of 80,000, to each of the Company’s non-employee directors, under the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $0.84 per share, the closing price on the February 16, 2016, the date of grant. In addition, each of the Company’s non-employee directors were also awarded 40,000 restricted shares of Company common stock under the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan of which 10,000 restricted shares vested at the end of each calendar quarter in 2016. The options are subject to

25

Table of Contents

time-based vesting in equal annual installments over a two-year period on the first and second anniversaries of the date of the grant, provided that the recipient remains a director through the vesting dates. The stock option and restricted stock awards are subject to the standard terms and conditions of our form of stock option and restricted stock agreements which include earlier vesting upon a change in control.

On February 9, 2017, the Board approved an award of 40,000 restricted shares under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan vesting evenly over the ensuing four quarters to each non-employee director. The award of stock options, as part of our Director Compensation Program for non-employee directors, however, was delayed until such time as Proposal IV could be submitted to, and approved by, our shareholders.

Discretionary Awards. As part of the Director Compensation Program, the Board may also make discretionary equity-based awards from time to time under our Plan.

Minimum dollar value stock ownership requirements. Each non-employee director receiving the above equity based awards will be subject to a minimum dollar value stock ownership holding requirement with respect to the awards received as well as all prior equity awards under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan which requirement is intended to align the ability to sell shares with the performance of the Company’s stock price. The non-employee Directors will each be subject to a minimum dollar value stock ownership requirement equal to six times the annual Board retainer ($270,000) below which dollar threshold they would be precluded from selling shares of Company stock acquired from the Company under its 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

Reimbursement of Expenses. Non-employee Directors are also reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board or committee meetings and reasonable out-of-pocket business expenses associated with their Board service.

Long-term Incentive Compensation. The Company did not have a Long Term Incentive Compensation plan in place performance in 2016 for its Non-Employee Directors.

26

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the compensation of our non-employee Directors in 2016. For Dr. Joslyn, our Chief Executive Officer and only management director, no separate compensation is paid for his service as a director. For a summary of Dr. Joslyn’s compensation see the Summary Compensation Table.

Director Compensation Table

Employee Directors

The Director compensation program provides that employee Directors receive no additional compensation in connection with their board service. There was one employee Director in 2016.

27

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Practices and Risk

The following “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section describes generally our compensation policies and practices that are applicable for executive and management employees. We use common variable compensation designs across all of our business units and divisions, with a significant focus on corporate and business financial performance as generally described in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Throughout this section of the Proxy Statement, the individuals who served as the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as well as the other individuals included in the Summary Compensation Table herein, are referred to as the “named executive officers.”

Overview of Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and evaluating the Company’s policies governing the compensation of its executive officers, including its named executive officers. The Compensation Committee reviews and proposes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the compensation to be paid to the Chief Executive Officer. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves the compensation to be paid to all other executive officers. The Compensation Committee ensures that the total compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers is fair, reasonable and competitive.

Clawback Policy

In order to further align management’s interests with those of shareholders and to support the Company’s governance practices, the Board of Directors adopted a recoupment policy applicable to annual bonuses and other short-term and long-term incentive compensation based on financial targets (“Incentive Compensation”) received by current and former executive officers of the Company and such other senior executives/employees of the Company who may from time to time be deemed subject to the policy by the Board of Directors (“Covered Executive”). The policy provides that if, as a result of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements due to the Company’s material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, a Covered Executive received more Incentive Compensation than the Covered Executive would have received absent the incorrect financial statements, the Company shall recover said excess Incentive Compensation (defined as the excess of (i) the actual amount of Incentive Compensation paid to the Covered Executive over (ii) the Incentive Compensation that would have been paid based on the restated financial results during the three-year period preceding the date on which the Company is required to prepare such restatement). The policy also provides that if the Board of Directors makes a determination in its sole discretion that a Covered Executive engaged in Misconduct (as defined below), the Board of Directors may require reimbursement or forfeiture of all or part of the Incentive Compensation received by the Covered Executive. The Board of Directors may use its judgment in determining the amount to be recovered. Misconduct is defined as (i) conviction of a felony, (ii) material breach of any agreement with the Company, (iii) material breach of any Company policy or code, (iv) act of theft, embezzlement or fraud, (v) misrepresentation or misstatement of financial or performance results, and (vi) any other act or event that the Board of Directors has determined that recoupment is appropriate.

Compensation Objective

The Company’s executive compensation programs are designed to achieve the following objectives:

28

Table of Contents

Role of Others in Compensation Decisions

The Compensation Committee makes all of the decisions with respect to the compensation received by the Company’s executive officers other than the Company’s chief executive officer which the Committee reviews and proposes recommendations to the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee meets outside the presence of all of the Company’s executive officers to consider appropriate compensation recommendations for the Company’s chief executive officer. For all other executive officers, the Compensation Committee meets outside the presence of all executive officers except for the Company’s chief executive officer. The Company’s chief executive officer periodically reviews each of the other executive officers’ performance with the Compensation Committee and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to any appropriate changes in base salary, bonus and grants of long-term equity incentive awards for the executive officers, excluding himself. Based in part on these recommendations and other considerations, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves such compensation arrangements of the Company’s executive officers other than the Company’s chief executive officer. The Compensation Committee also annually analyzes the chief executive officer’s performance and determines his salary, annual cash bonus and grants of long-term equity incentive awards and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee reviews and makes recommendation to the Board of Directors regarding all new equity related incentive plans for senior management.

Consideration of Most Recent Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee also considers the results of the Company’s most recent shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation. At the 2016 Annual Meeting, the Company’s shareholders voted overwhelmingly in favor of the compensation of our named executive officers: approximately 85.4% of the shares outstanding voted in favor of the program. In light of these results, the Compensation Committee decided to continue to include in the 2016 executive compensation program all of the features previously approved by the Company’s shareholders. The Board of Directors previously determined that future shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation will be submitted to shareholders of the Company annually until the next required advisory vote on the frequency of conducting advisory votes on executive compensation.

2016 Executive Compensation Components

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, the principal components of compensation for the Company’s executive officers were:

Annual Base Salary

Base salary is designed to attract and retain experienced executive officers who can drive the achievement of

29

Table of Contents

the Company’s goals. While the initial base salary for the Company’s executive officers was determined by an assessment based upon the responsibilities of the position, the expected contribution of the position to our business, the experience and skill required for the position, and competition in the marketplace for the talent; the factors used in determining increases in base salary include individual performance, changes in role and/or responsibility and changes in the competitive market environment. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the base salary for each executive officer.

Bonus

The Company established a formal performance based bonus for its named executive officers. See “Bonus Plan 2016” below for a description of the bonus program for 2016. Discretionary bonuses for executive officers and employees may also be considered by the Compensation Committee and recommended at the discretion of the Compensation Committee for approval by our Board of Directors.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

The Company awards long-term equity incentive awards to executive officers, including the named executive officers, as part of its total compensation package. These awards are consistent with the Company’s pay for performance principles and align the interests of the executive officers to the interests of the Company’s shareholders. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the amount of each award to be granted to each named executive officer. Long-term equity incentive awards are made pursuant to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

The Company’s long-term equity incentives are currently in the form of options to acquire its common stock. Stock option awards provide the Company’s executive officers with the right to purchase shares of its common stock at a fixed exercise price for a period of up to ten years under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. Stock options are granted under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a price not less than the prevailing market value at the time of grant and will have realizable value only if the Company’s stock price increases. Stock options are earned on the basis of continued service to the Company and generally vest over a number of years or based upon other specific performance based criteria.

The Company’s long-term equity incentive also can be in the form of restricted share awards of the Company’s common stock under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. Restricted stock awards provide the Company’s executive officers with the shares of its common stock subject to certain restrictions and/or vesting requirements. Restricted stock shares will be earned on the basis of continued service to the Company and will vest as set forth in the separate award agreements.

The Compensation Committee determines the amount and features of the stock options and/or restricted stock, if any, to be awarded to executive officers. The Compensation Committee evaluates a number of criteria, including the past service of each such executive officer to the Company, the present and potential contributions of such executive officer to the Company’s success and such other factors as the Compensation Committee shall deem relevant in connection with accomplishing the purposes of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, including the executive officer’s current stock holdings, years of service, position with the Company and other factors. The Compensation Committee will not apply a formula assigning specific weights to any of these factors when making its determination.

Other Benefits

Retirement Benefits. The Company maintains a Simple Individual Retirement Arrangement plan in which all full-time employees, including the Company’s named executive officers, are eligible to participate. The Company provides this plan to help its employees save some amount of their cash compensation for retirement in a tax efficient manner. The Company does not provide an option for its employees to invest in the Company’s stock under the 401k plan. The Company matches 100% of the employee’s contribution up to a maximum of 3% of the employee’s compensation.

Health and Welfare Benefits. All full-time employees, including our named executive officers, may participate in the Company’s health and welfare benefit programs, including medical, dental and vision care coverage as may be provided and applicable to all employees.

30

Table of Contents

Perquisites. Because the Company provides limited perquisites to certain executive officers, the Company does not believe these perquisites and other personal benefits constitute a material component of the executive officers’ compensation packages.

Employment Agreements

During 2016, the Company had employment agreements in effect with Dr. Alan Joslyn, Mr. Michael Sullivan, and Dr. Martin Handfield. The Company entered into employment agreements with these officers to ensure that they would perform their respective roles with the Company for an extended period of time. In addition, the Company also considered the critical nature of each of their positions and the Company’s need to retain them when the Company committed to these agreements. See “Employment Contracts and Change in Control Arrangements.”

Bonus Plan 2016

On August 25, 2016, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Oragenics, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the 2016 cash bonus program for Dr. Joslyn, Mr. Sullivan, and Dr. Handfield recommended by the Compensation Committee. Under such cash bonus program Dr. Joslyn, Mr. Sullivan, and Dr. Handfield are eligible for cash bonuses of up to $102,083, $76,650, and $48,900 respectively, equaling up to 50%, 35%, and 25% of their respective base salaries (each a “Bonus Target”). In the case of Dr. Joslyn his bonus amount represents a portion of his base salary for the time since he joined the Company

The bonuses payable to Dr. Joslyn were to be based upon the achievement of the following objectives:

(i) Up to 40% of the Bonus Target for meeting budgeted operational objectives and developing corporate organizational strategy;

(ii) Up to 30% of the Bonus Target for financial performance objectives related to the Company’s raising capital;

(iii) Up to 10% of the Bonus Target for objectives related to AG013 clinical trial;

(iv) Up to 10% of the Bonus Target for research and development objectives related to lantibiotics; and

(v) Up to 10% of the Bonus Target designated to be discretionary as determined by the Board.

The bonuses payable to Mr. Sullivan were to be based upon the achievement of the following objectives:

(i) Up to 40% of the Bonus Target for meeting budgeted operational objectives including as to the consumer probiotic business;

(iii) Up to 40% of the Bonus Target for financial performance objectives related to the Company’s raising capital and finalizing an approved budget and incentive plan for 2017;

(iii) Up to 10% of the Bonus Target related to investor relations and securities compliance matters; and

(iv) Up to 10% of the Bonus Target designated to be discretionary as determined by the Board.

Each of Dr. Joslyn and Mr. Sullivan were also eligible for an additional 10% of Bonus Target should capital raise thresholds be exceeded.

The bonuses payable to Dr. Handfield were to be based upon the achievement of the following objectives:

(i) Up to 20% of the Bonus Target for meeting operational objectives tied to management of staff for approved budgets and timelines;

(ii) Up to 12.5% of the Bonus Target for financial performance objectives related to the Company’s intellectual property;

31

Table of Contents

(iii) Up to 50% of the Bonus Target for various research and development objectives related to lantibiotics including manufacturing and compound identification;

(iv) Up to 2.5% of the Bonus Target for additional research projects; and

(v) Up to 10% of the Bonus Target designated to be discretionary as determined by the Board.

Dr. Handfield was also eligible for an additional 10% of Bonus Target should the manufacturing run be completed by a designated time as well as certain request for proposal and protocols being in place.

2016 Compensation Decisions

The Company believes that the total compensation paid to its named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 achieved the overall objectives of its executive compensation program. In accordance with its overall objectives, executive compensation for 2016 was competitive with other similarly-sized companies. The Compensation Committee took the following key compensation actions in 2016:

The Compensation Committee did not authorize or approve any changes in the annual salary for any of the Company’s named executive officers during 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we made no stock awards to our named executive officers other than Dr. Joslyn upon commencement of his services to us as President and Chief Executive Officer. See Summary Compensation Table.

32

Table of Contents

The Compensation Committee established a performance based 2016 bonus plan for the named executive officers pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements. The Committee subsequently approved bonus awards to the named executive officers based on such bonus plan in the amounts set forth in the Summary Compensation Table below:

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation in 2016 and 2015 for services in all capacities paid or accrued by the Company to Dr. Alan Joslyn, Mr. Michael Sullivan, our Chief Financial Officer who also served as our interim principal executive officer through June of 2016, and our next most highly compensated officer who earned more than $100,000 in total salary and bonus during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Named Executive Officers”).

33

Table of Contents

Current Executive Officers and Key Employee

We are led by a team of executives that are chosen by the Board of Directors. Currently, we have three executive officers, set forth below is biographical information for executive officers and certain identified key employees.

Executive Officers

Alan F. Joslyn, Ph.D. The biography of Dr. Joslyn is included above under Proposal I “Information About Nominees.”

Michael Sullivan. Mr. Sullivan, age 60, has served as our Interim Principal Executive Officer from October 30, 2014 until June 5, 2016 and served as our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer since February 6, 2012. Mr. Sullivan has held senior level financial positions for several publicly and privately held businesses including Utek Corporation, eANGLER, and HSN Direct International Limited. Most recently, he was the Group Financial Officer for the Investigative Services and Litigation Consulting Services segment of First Advantage Corporation a firm specializing in talent acquisition solutions where he streamlined the employee recruitment process. Mr. Sullivan is a Florida Certified Public Accountant. He graduated from the Florida State University with a Bachelor of Science in Accounting and a Master of Business Administration.

Key Employee

Dr. Martin Handfield. Dr. Handfield, age 45, is, the Company’s Senior Vice President of Discovery Research and previously has served as our Director of Research and Development. Dr. Handfield has served the Company since January 2009. Prior to joining our Company, Dr. Handfield held a position as Tenured Associate Professor at the Center for Molecular Microbiology and the Department of Oral Biology at the University of Florida College of Dentistry, where he co-invented IVIAT and co-founded ivi Gene Corp. and Epicure Corp. to commercialize this and related technologies. Dr. Handfield holds a B.S. degree in Biochemistry, and a MS degree and PhD in Microbiology and Immunology from the Université Laval College of Medicine in Canada, and did postdoctoral training at the University of Florida.

Our executive officers serve at the pleasure of our Board of Directors until their successors are elected or qualified and subject, in certain cases to employment agreements we have entered into with our officers. Our new chief Executive Officer and President Dr. Alan Joslyn and Mr. Sullivan, our Chief Financial Officer and Dr. Handfield, our Senior Vice President of Discovery Research, each have employment agreements with us. See “Executive Compensation—Employment Contracts and Change in Control Arrangements.”

Incentive Awards

The Compensation Committee believes that our future success depends, in large part, upon our ability to maintain a competitive position in attracting, retaining and motivating key personnel. The Compensation Committee utilizes the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to provide incentives to employees. We do not have any separate long-term incentive plans that provide compensation intended to serve as incentives for performance other than awards contemplated under, or pursuant to, our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we made equity awards to Dr. Alan Joslyn upon his employment with the Company. The awards consisted of stock options to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock and a grant of 30,000 shares of restricted stock of the Company. We also paid Dr. Joslyn a sign on bonus of $25,000. No other awards were made to our executive officers in 2016.

34

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards

The following table provides information concerning unexercised options outstanding as of December 31, 2016:

Employment Contracts and Change in Control Arrangements

Employment Agreement—Dr. Joslyn

We have entered into an Executive Employment Agreement dated as of June 6, 2016, with Dr. Alan Joslyn pursuant to which Dr. Joslyn serves as our President and Chief Executive. The employment term is a one-year term with an automatic 12 month extension thereafter unless either party provides the other 30 days’ prior written notice of its intention not to renew the employment agreement.

Dr. Joslyn received a one-time signing bonus of $25,000 upon execution of the employment agreement and is currently entitled to receive an annual base salary of $350,000 which is subject to annual review and adjustment by the Company’s Board of Directors. He is eligible to receive annual performance bonus from the Company of up to fifty percent (50%) of his annual base salary based upon appropriate Company-based and individual-based targets specified by the Compensation Committee of the Board, in its discretion, as approved by the full Board of Directors. Dr. Joslyn is also entitled to participate in our employee benefit plans on terms comparable to other full time employees as well as four weeks paid vacation annually.

35

Table of Contents

The employment agreement also provided for Dr. Joslyn to be granted equity awards under the Company’s 2012 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan consisting of (i) stock options to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.55 per share which stock options shall vest is six installments of 50,000 shares each every six months after June 6, 2016, provided that he has continued his employment with the Company through such dates, and (ii) 30,000 shares of restricted stock of the Company, vesting in two installments on the six month and twelve month anniversaries of June 6, 2016. All of the performance bonuses, as well as any equity awards which are granted to Dr. Joslyn or which become vested as a result of the satisfaction of financial performance goals of the Company, are subject to the Company’s policy on recoupment or clawback of executive incentive compensation.

Dr. Joslyn is subject to a covenant not to disclose our confidential information during his employment term and an assignment of intellectual property rights. Also, during his employment term and for a period of 12 months thereafter, Dr. Joslyn covenants not to compete with us and not to solicit any of our customers, vendors or employees. If Dr. Joslyn breaches any of these covenants, the Company will be entitled to injunctive relief.

If Dr. Joslyn’s employment is terminated by us for Cause (as defined in his employment agreement) or by Dr. Joslyn during the term of the agreement, he will be entitled to receive his (i) his then-current annual base salary through the date of termination; (ii) any reimbursable expenses for which he has not yet been reimbursed as of the date of termination; and (iii) any other rights and vested benefits (if any) provided under employee benefit plans and programs of the Company, determined in accordance with the applicable terms and provisions of such plans and programs (“Accrued Compensation”).

If Dr. Joslyn’s employment is terminated by us without “Cause”, subject to his execution of a release of claims against us, and in addition to the payment of the Accrued Compensation, the Company is obligated to make payments to Dr. Joslyn within 60 days after his termination date equal to six months of his annual base salary, as in effect at the termination date, plus any earned but unpaid bonus (the “Additional Severance Payments”).

The employment agreement also contains change of control provisions providing that if Dr. Joslyn’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without Cause during the period of ninety (90) days following a Change in Control (as that term is defined below) of the Company, in lieu of the Additional Severance Payments described above, Dr. Joslyn will be entitled to receive a severance payment equal to the sum of (i) six (6) months of his annual base salary, at the higher of the base salary rate in effect on the date of termination or the base salary rate in effect immediately before the effective date of the Change of Control, and (ii) his Performance Bonus for the year which includes the effective date of the Change in Control, payable at the target level of performance, which will be paid in a single lump sum after his execution and non-revocation of the Release. In addition, he will also receive in the same payment the amount of any performance bonus that, as of the date of termination, has been earned by Dr. Joslyn but has not yet been paid by the Company. If Dr. Joslyn holds any stock options or other stock awards granted under the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan which are not fully vested at the time his employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without Cause during the period of ninety (90) days following a Change in Control, such equity awards shall become fully vested as of the termination date. For purposes of the employment agreement, the term “Change in Control” means a transaction or series of transactions which constitutes a sale of control of the Company, a change in effective control of the Company, or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, or a transaction which qualifies as a “change in ownership” or “change in effective control” of the Company or a “change in ownership of substantially all of the assets” of the Company under the standards set forth in Treasury Regulation section 1.409A-3(i)(5).

Dr. Joslyn’s employment agreement also provides that each of the payments and benefits under the agreement are subject to compliance with Section 409A of the Code and it includes time of payment language intended to comply with Section 409A requirements.

Employment Agreements—Mr. Sullivan and Dr. Handfield

We have entered into employment agreements with our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Michael Sullivan and Dr. Martin Handfield, our Senior Vice-President of Research and Development (the “Employment Agreements”). The annual base salaries provided in the Employment Agreements are payable in installments consistent with our normal payroll practices. Mr. Sullivan and Dr. Handfield are also eligible under the Employment Agreements to receive annual

36

Table of Contents

bonuses during the term at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors with Mr. Sullivan’s employment agreement providing for such a discretionary bonus of up to 35% of his base salary and with Dr. Handfield’s employment agreement providing for such a discretionary bonus of up to 25% of his base salary.

The Employment Agreements are terminable at any time by either party and if the executive officer is involuntarily terminated by us he shall receive his base salary and vacation pay each accrued through the date of termination, and any nonforfeitable benefits earned and payable to him under the terms of the employee handbook (which applies to all employees) and benefits available under any applicable incentive plan in which the executive participates. In addition, if the executive officer’s separation from employment is not voluntary and without cause, we would be obligated to pay the executive officer six months of his annual base salary as severance and the executive shall be entitled to out placement services. If the executive officer is terminated for cause, he shall be entitled to receive his base salary and accrued vacation due through the date of termination and any nonforfeitable benefits already earned and payable to the executive under the terms of the employee handbook or other applicable incentive plans maintained by us. Cause is defined in the Employment Agreements as any action that is illegal, immoral, or improper that reflects on the Company, the employee, or the ability of either to function optimally. If the executive officer voluntarily resigns, he shall be entitled to this base salary and accrued vacation due through the date of termination (including any mutually agreed upon notice period) and any nonforfeitable benefits already earned and payable to the executive officer employee under the terms of the employee handbook or other incentive plans maintained by us.

If the executive officer dies during the term of employment with us, his estate shall be paid his salary as it would have accrued over a period of thirty days after the executive officer’s death. We shall also extend the executive officer’s right to exercise vested stock options for six months. In the event the executive officer becomes disabled (as defined in the then applicable short and long-term disability insurance policies) we shall pay to the executive officer his salary as it would have accrued over a period of 30 days after the executive became so disabled and we shall extend the executive officer’s right to exercise vested stock options for six months.

The Employment Agreements also each include non-disclosure and Company ownership of invention provisions, as well as a provision providing for the Company to defend and indemnify the executive if the executive is named as a defendant in any lawsuit regarding any action taken within the scope of employment.

In the event of a change in control, any stock options or other awards granted (other than performance awards) under our Stock Incentive Plan shall become immediately vested in full and, in the case of stock options, exercisable in full. If the change in control results in an involuntary separation from employment of the executive officer within 180 days following a change in control, the executive officer would be entitled to (i) receive six months of salary and the extension of his benefits (excluding vacation time and paid time off) and (ii) exercise vested options for six months from the date of separation. Under the Employment Agreements, “involuntary separation of employment” means (i) termination without cause, (ii) any reduction in responsibilities of office altering the status of the executive officer as an employee, or (iii) the duplication of the executive officer’s position by an equivalent executive in an acquiring entity; and “change in control” means the sale of the entire company, or substantially all of its assets, or the sale of the business unit employing an individual which results in the termination of employment or subsequent transfer of the employment relationship to another legal entity, or entity, or single party acquiring more shares than are owned by the Koski Family Limited Partnership, including its members and their immediate families, including spouses and their children.

On February 20, 2015, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement, effective January 1, 2015, with Mr. Sullivan. The terms of Mr. Sullivan’s amended and restated employment agreement were substantially similar to those of the previous agreement disclosed above except for:

37

Table of Contents

38

Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table sets forth information about beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of March 21, 2017 (unless otherwise noted) by (i) each shareholder that has indicated in public filings that the shareholder beneficially owns more than five percent of the Common Stock, (ii) each of the Company’s directors and named officers and (iii) all directors and officers as a group. Except as otherwise noted, each person listed below, either alone or together with members of the person’s family sharing the same household, had, to our knowledge, sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed next to the person’s name.

39

Table of Contents

40

Table of Contents

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (or, to the extent applicable, our disinterested directors) is responsible for reviewing all transactions between the Company and any officer or Director of the Company or any entity in which an officer of Director has a material interest. Any such transactions must be on terms no less favorable than those that could be obtained on an arms-length basis from independent third parties.

Financing Transactions

The Lantibiotic Exclusive Channel Collaboration Agreement with Intrexon Corporation (“Intrexon”)

On June 5, 2012, the Company entered into an ECC with Intrexon that governs a “channel partnering” arrangement in which the Company will use Intrexon’s advanced transgene and cell engineering platforms for the development and production of lantibiotics, a class of peptide antibiotics that are naturally produced in Gram-positive bacteria and contain the characteristic polycyclic thioether amino acids lanthionine and methyllanthonine (collectively, the “Lantibiotics Program”). The ECC establishes committees comprised of Company and Intrexon representatives that will govern activities related to the Lantibiotics Program in the areas of project establishment, chemistry, manufacturing and controls matters, clinical and regulatory matters, commercialization efforts and intellectual property matters.

The ECC grants the Company an exclusive worldwide license to use patents and other intellectual property of Intrexon in connection with the research, development, use, importing, exporting, manufacture, sale, and offer for sale of drug products involving the direct administration to humans or companion animals of a lantibiotic for the prevention or treatment of infectious disease (“Oragenics Products”). Such license is exclusive with respect to any clinical development, selling, offering for sale or other commercialization of Oragenics Products, and otherwise is non-exclusive. Subject to limited exceptions, the Company may not sublicense the rights described without Intrexon’s written consent.

Under the ECC, and subject to certain exceptions, the Company is responsible for, among other things, funding the further anticipated development of lantibiotics toward the goal of commercialization, conducting preclinical and clinical development of candidate lantibiotics, as well as for other aspects of manufacturing and the commercialization of the product(s). Among other things, Intrexon is responsible for technology discovery efforts, cell-engineering development, certain aspects of the manufacturing process, and costs of filing, prosecution and maintenance of Intrexon’s patents.

Subject to certain expense allocations and other offsets provided in the ECC, the Company will pay Intrexon on a quarterly basis 25% of gross quarterly profits derived in that quarter from the sale of products developed from the ECC, calculated on an Oragenics Product-by-Oragenics Product basis. The Company has likewise agreed to pay Intrexon on a quarterly basis 50% of revenue obtained in that quarter from a sublicensor in the event of a sublicensing arrangement.

During the first 18 months of the agreement, neither the Company nor Intrexon may terminate the ECC, except under limited circumstances, including in the event of a material breach by the other party and Intrexon may terminate the ECC under certain circumstances if the Company assigns its rights under the ECC without Intrexon’s consent. Following the first 12 months of the agreement, Intrexon may also terminate the ECC if the Company fails to use diligent efforts to develop and commercialize Oragenics Products or if the Company elects not to pursue the development of a Lantibiotics Program identified by Intrexon that is a “Superior Therapy” as defined in the ECC. Following the first 18 months of the agreement, the Company may voluntarily terminate the ECC at any time upon 90 days written notice to Intrexon.

Upon termination of the ECC, the Company may continue to develop and commercialize any Oragenics Product that has been, at the time of termination:

41

Table of Contents

The Company’s obligation to pay 25% of gross profits or revenue described above with respect to these “retained” products as well as to use diligent efforts to develop and commercialize these “retained” Oragenics Products will survive termination of the ECC.

In addition, in partial consideration for each party’s execution and delivery of the ECC, the Company entered into a Stock Issuance Agreement with Intrexon. Pursuant to the Stock Issuance Agreement the Company issued to Intrexon 4,392,425 shares of the Company common stock as an initial technology access fee, in consideration for the execution and delivery of the ECC and granted Intrexon certain equity participation rights and registration rights.

Under the Stock Issuance Agreement and as part of the ECC, the Company has also agreed to make certain payments to Intrexon upon the Company’s achievement of designated milestones in the form of shares of Company Common Stock or at the Company’s option make a cash payment to Intrexon (based upon the fair market value of the shares otherwise required to be issued). The milestone events and amounts payable are as follows:

(i) upon filing of the first Investigational New Drug application with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for an Oragenics Product, that number of shares equal to the number of shares of Common Stock comprising 1.0% of the Base Shares ;

(ii) upon the dosing of the first patient in the first Phase 2 clinical study with an Oragenics Product, that number of shares equal to the number of shares of Common Stock comprising 1.5% of the Base Shares;

(iii) upon the dosing of the first patient in the first Phase 3 clinical study with an Oragenics Product, that number of shares equal to the number of shares of Common Stock comprising 2% of the Base Shares;

(iv) upon the filing of the first New Drug Application (“NDA”) or Biologics License Application (“BLA”) with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for an Oragenics Product, or alternatively the filing of the first equivalent regulatory filing with a foreign regulatory agency, that number of shares equal to the number of shares of Common Stock comprising 2.5% of the Base Shares; and

(v) upon the granting of the first regulatory approval of an Oragenics Product, that number of shares equal to the number of shares of Common Stock comprising 3% of the Base Shares.

Base Shares is defined in the Stock Issuance Agreement to mean (i) the number of shares of Company common stock together with any securities or instruments convertible or exercisable for shares of common stock issued and outstanding at the time of the applicable milestone event, (ii) minus any shares issuable upon conversion of Capital Inducement Securities. Capital Inducement Securities is defined in the Stock Issuance Agreement to mean warrants or other convertible securities of the Company issued to investors in connection with a debt or equity investment in the Company that are issued in addition to the primary investment securities and in an amount not to exceed 10% of the overall number of shares issued in the investment (on an as-converted to common stock basis).

During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we paid $548,994 and $298,581, respectively, to Intrexon relating to work performed under the Lantibiotics ECC.

September 2013-The Probiotics Exclusive Channel Collaboration Agreement with Intrexon

On September 30, 2013, the Company entered into the Probiotics ECC with Intrexon that governs a “channel collaboration” arrangement in which the Company will use Intrexon’s proprietary technology relating to the identification, design and production of genetically modified cells, DNA vectors and in vivo control of expression (the “Technology”) for the development and commercialization of probiotics, specifically the direct administration to humans of genetically modified probiotics for the treatment of diseases of the oral cavity, throat, sinus and esophagus,

42

Table of Contents

including, but not limited to, aphthous stomatitis and Behcet’s disease (collectively, the “Probiotics Program”). The Probiotics ECC establishes committees comprised of Company and Intrexon representatives that will govern activities related to the Probiotics Program in the areas of project establishment, chemistry, manufacturing and controls matters, clinical and regulatory matters, commercialization efforts and intellectual property matters.

The Probiotics ECC grants the Company an exclusive worldwide license to utilize Intrexon’s Technology to develop and commercialize probiotics, specifically the direct administration to humans of genetically modified probiotics for the treatment of diseases of the oral cavity, throat, sinus and esophagus (“Company Products”). Such license is exclusive with respect to any clinical development, selling, offering for sale or other commercialization of Company Products, and otherwise is non-exclusive. Subject to limited exceptions, the Company may not sublicense the rights described without Intrexon’s written consent.

Under the Probiotics ECC, and subject to certain exceptions, the Company is responsible for, among other things, funding the further anticipated development of probiotics toward the goal of commercialization, conducting preclinical and clinical development of candidate probiotics, as well as for other aspects of manufacturing and the commercialization of the product(s). Among other things, Intrexon is responsible for technology discovery efforts, cell-engineering development, and certain aspects of the manufacturing process.

The Company will pay Intrexon 10% of the net sales derived from the sale of products developed from the exclusive channel collaboration relating to the Probiotics Program. The Company has likewise agreed to pay Intrexon a percentage of revenue obtained from a sublicensee in the event of a sublicensing arrangement. The percentage of the revenue to be paid will be determined at the time that a sublicense agreement is negotiated.

The Company may voluntarily terminate the Probiotics ECC upon 90 days written notice to Intrexon. Intrexon may also terminate the Probiotics ECC if the Company breaches the Probiotics ECC and fails to cure the breach within 60 days or the Company does not pursue development of the Superior Therapy under the probiotics identified by Intrexon that is a “Superior Therapy” as defined in the Probiotics ECC.

Upon termination of the Probiotics ECC, the Company may continue to develop and commercialize any Company Product that, at the time of termination, satisfies at least one of the following criteria:

In addition, in partial consideration for each party’s execution and delivery of the Probiotics ECC, on September 30, 2013 the Company entered into a Stock Purchase and Issuance Agreement and a First Amendment to the Stock Purchase and Issuance Agreement (collectively the “SPIA”) with Intrexon. Pursuant to the SPIA, the Company paid Intrexon an up-front technology access fee of $6,000,000 (the “Technology Access Fee”) in consideration for the execution of the Probiotics ECC. The Technology Access Fee was paid to Intrexon by the Company through the (i) issuance of 1,348,000 (at $3.00 per share) shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Technology Access Shares”), and (ii) a convertible promissory note in the amount of $1,956,000 which is payable, at the Company’s option, in cash or shares of Company common stock (the “Convertible Note”). The Convertible Note matured on December 31, 2013 and required the Company to obtain shareholder approval prior to conversion of the Convertible Note. The conversion price is equal to the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day immediately prior to the date of conversion.

43

Table of Contents

On September 30, 2013 the Company also sold to Intrexon 1,300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price per share of $3.00 for gross proceeds of $3,900,000. The Company intends to use the proceeds from this sale of common stock towards development of the Company’s key initiatives relating to the Probiotics Program, and general corporate purposes.

During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we paid $0 and $195, respectively, to Intrexon relating to work performed under the Probiotics ECC.

On September 30, 2015, the Company and Intrexon mutually agreed to terminate the Exclusive Channel Collaboration Agreement dated September 30, 2013 regarding the development and commercialization of probiotics (the “Live Biotherapeutic Products ECC”). The termination of the Live Biotherapeutic Products ECC was to enable Oragenics to focus its resources on the lantibiotic and oral mucositis programs.

Participation in Underwritten Public Offering-November 2013

On November 20, 2013, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 4,400,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $2.50 per share resulting in gross proceeds of $11,000,000. Intrexon participated in this public offering acquiring 1,242,490 shares of our common stock.

Repayment of Intrexon Convertible Note

On December 18, 2013, the Company issued to Intrexon 698,241 shares of Company common stock in connection with the conversion of the Convertible Note and accrued interest previously issued by the Company to Intrexon on September 30, 2013 as partial consideration for the Technology Access Fee required by the Exclusive Channel Collaboration Agreement entered into with respect to the Company’s probiotics research and development. The Note was payable to Intrexon, at the Company’s option, in cash or shares of Company common stock prior to the maturity date of December 31, 2013 and the conversion price was equal to the closing price on the NYSE MKT of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day immediately prior to the date of conversion which was $2.82 per share.

44

Table of Contents

June 2015-The Oral Mucositis Exclusive Channel Collaboration Agreement with Intrexon and Intrexon Actobiotics NV

On June 9, 2015, the Company entered into an ECC with Intrexon and Intrexon Actobiotics NV (“Actobiotics”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intrexon, through which the Company intends to research, develop and commercialize products, including the continued development and commercialization of AG013, for use in the treatment of oral mucositis in humans and/or the administration to humans of a trefoil factor via genetically modified bacteria (including L. lactis) for the treatment of diseases and conditions of the oral cavity, throat, and esophagus, but, in any case, excluding the delivery of anti-cancer effectors for the purpose of treatment or prophylaxis of cancer (collectively, the “Program”). Contemporaneously with the ECC, the Company and Intrexon also entered into a Stock Issuance Agreement (the “SIA”) which authorized the issuance of the Technology Access Fee (as defined below) and the future stock issuance of our Common Stock to Intrexon upon the achievement of designated milestones. The ECC governs the “channel collaboration” arrangement in which we will use Intrexon’s proprietary technology relating to the identification, design and production of genetically modified bacteria (the “Technology”) for the purpose of developing the Program. The ECC provides for the establishment of committees comprised from us and Intrexon representatives that will govern activities in the areas of project establishment, chemistry, manufacturing and controls, clinical and regulatory matters, commercialization efforts, and intellectual property.

The ECC grants the Company an exclusive worldwide license to utilize Intrexon’s and Actobiotics’ intellectual property to develop and commercialize products, including the continued development and commercialization of AG013, for use in the treatment of oral mucositis in humans and/or the administration to humans of a trefoil factor via genetically modified bacteria (including L. lactis) for the treatment of diseases and conditions of the oral cavity, throat, and esophagus, but, in any case, excluding the delivery of anti-cancer effectors for the purpose of treatment or prophylaxis of cancer (the “Field”). It also grants us an exclusive license in the Field under all Information Controlled by Actobiotics (or otherwise by Intrexon) and existing as of the Effective Date relating to the regulatory approval of AG013, including regulatory filings, data, clinical trial reports, and rights thereunder.

Under the Oral Mucositis ECC, and subject to certain exceptions, we are responsible for, among other things, funding the further anticipated development of products toward the goal of commercialization, conducting preclinical and clinical development of candidate products, as well as for other aspects of manufacturing and the commercialization of the product(s).

The Company will pay Intrexon on a quarterly basis 12% of the net sales derived from the sale of products developed from the exclusive channel collaboration. The Company has likewise agreed to pay Intrexon on a quarterly basis 50% of revenue obtained in that quarter from a sublicensor in the event of a sublicensing arrangement.

The Company may voluntarily terminate the Oral Mucositis ECC upon 90 days written notice to Intrexon. Intrexon may also terminate the ECC if the Company breaches and fails to cure the breach within 60 days or the Company does not pursue development of the Superior Therapy under the probiotics identified by Intrexon that is a “Superior Therapy” as defined in the ECC.

Upon termination of the ECC, the Company may continue to develop and commercialize any Company Product that, at the time of termination that satisfies at least one of the following criteria:

45

Table of Contents

The Company has also agreed to make certain payments to Intrexon upon the Company’s achievement of designated milestones in the form of shares of Company Common Stock (based upon the fair market value of the shares otherwise required to be issued) unless the issuance of such shares would reasonably likely cause Intrexon to consolidate the Company’s financial statements with Intrexon’s financial statements, or at the Company’s option make a cash payment to Intrexon. The Commercialization Milestone Events and amounts payable are as follows:

During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we paid $932,645 and $263,590, respectively, to Intrexon relating to work performed under the Oral Mucositis ECC.

Repayment of Intrexon Convertible Note

On December 1, 2015, the Company issued to Intrexon 3,381,004 shares of the Company’s common stock in connection with the conversion of the Convertible Note and accrued interest previously issued by the Company to Intrexon on June 9, 2015 as partial consideration for the Technology Access Fee required by the Oral Mucositis Exclusive Channel Collaboration Agreement. The Convertible Note was payable to Intrexon, at the Company’s option, in cash or shares of Company common stock prior to the maturity date of December 31, 2015 and the conversion price was equal to the closing price on the NYSE MKT of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day immediately prior to the date of conversion which was $1.50 per share.

46

Table of Contents

The June 30, 2016 Private Placement

One June 30, 2016, the Company closed on a private placement of 9,045,679 shares of its common stock to three accredited investors. The investors in the private placement included current Company shareholders, KFLP (5,815,080 shares) and Intrexon Corporation (“Intrexon”) (2,261,419 shares), as well as the Company’s Chairman, Dr. Frederick Telling (969,180 shares). Approximately $4.667 million was raised of which $2,000,000 was payable by the KFLP under a note payable on or before September 30, 2016. On September 15, 2016, the note payable with the KFLP was amended. Under the terms of the amendment, the KFLP paid $1,000,000 on September 30, 2016 which was first applied to accrued interest and then to the outstanding principal balance. In addition, the amendment extended the maturity date on the remaining principal balance of the note payable to December 31, 2016 and increased the interest rate on the note payable from 3% per annum to 6% per annum. On December 29, 2016, the KFLP made a payment of $1,000,000 which was first applied to accrued interest and then to the outstanding principal balance. The note was paid in full in January of 2017. The private placement was approved by the Company’s audit committee and disinterested directors. As of December 31, 2016, including the results of the financing, Intrexon and the KFLP beneficially owned 31.5% and 34.5%, respectively of the Company’s common stock.

Sale of Consumer Probiotics Business

On June 27, 2016, the Company completed the sale of its consumer probiotics business to ProBiora Health, LLC, (“ProBiora Health”) an entity owned by Ms. Christine L. Koski, a director at the time of the transaction. The purchase price was $1,700,000 in cash of which $1,250,000 was paid at closing and $450,000 was payable on or before July 31, 2016. The note accrued interest at the rate of 1% per annum and was paid in full on July 29, 2016. In connection with the sale, ProBiora Health assumed certain liabilities. ProBiora Health is obligated to pay the Company contingent consideration annually over a 10 year period based on a percentage of sales of products using the Purchased Assets, with a maximum obligation to the Company of $2,000,000.

The transaction was approved by a special committee of the Company’s board of directors consisting solely of disinterested directors and Griffin Securities rendered a fairness opinion in connection with the transaction. Ms. Koski, a director since 2009, and a significant shareholder of the Company through the Koski Family Limited Partnership, resigned as a director of the Company upon completion of the sale. In addition, the Company entered into a Transition Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) with ProBiora Health. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will provide accounting, inventory management, shipping, logistics, customer, vendor, supplier, general business support, IT, pharmacovigilance, quality assurance, regulatory, and clinical services to ProBiora Health. In exchange for the services, ProBiora Health is to pay the Company three percent (3%) of is net sales of all ProBiora3 products sold during the term of the Agreement. The term of the Agreement is for a ninety day (90) period but may be terminated earlier at the option of ProBiora Health. The Company is also subletting space to ProBiora Health at the rate of $1,623 per month. The sublease runs through February 2017. The sublease may be terminated prior to February 2017 under certain provisions by either party. The Company will also provide fulfillment services to ProBiora Health during the term that the sublease is in effect. The Company will receive compensation for those services in an amount equal to the direct costs in providing such services. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, we received $26,333 from ProBiora Health under our Transition Services, sublease, and fulfillment services agreements with ProBiora Health.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s officers and Directors and any persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of the Company’s Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of such securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission Officers, Directors and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of the Common Stock are required by applicable regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on its review of copies of forms furnished to the Company and written representations from the executive officers, directors and holders of ten percent or more of the Company’s Common Stock, the Company believes, all persons subject to the reporting requirements with regard to the Common Stock complied with the applicable filing requirements during 2016.

47

Table of Contents

OTHER MATTERS

Interim Corporate Mailings

In accordance with National Instrument 54-102 of the Canadian Securities Administrators, registered and beneficial shareholders of the Company may elect annually to receive interim corporate mailings, including interim financial statements of the Company, if they so request. If you wish to receive such mailings, please complete the form in Appendix B and mail as instructed on the form.

Availability of Annual Report on Form 10-K

Accompanying this Proxy Statement is a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016. Shareholders who would like additional copies of the Annual Report on Form 10-K should direct their requests in writing to:

Oragenics, Inc.

4902 Eisenhower Blvd., Suite 125

Tampa, Florida 33634

Attention: Michael Sullivan, Secretary.

Miscellaneous

Management does not know of any matters to be brought before the Annual Meeting other than as described in this Proxy Statement. Should any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons designated as proxies will vote in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.

Tampa, Florida

March 29, 2017

48

Table of Contents

Appendix A

FIRST AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

ORAGENICS, INC.

2012 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

This First Amendment to the Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is made pursuant to Section 12 of the Plan.

Recitals:

WHEREAS, the Plan was originally adopted by the Company on August 6, 2012 and approved by the shareholders on October 23, 2012; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors believes it would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to increase the authorized shares available under the Plan.

NOW THEREFORE, Section 4 titled “SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN” is hereby amended as follows:

The reference to “4,000,000” is replaced with “5,500,000”, to reflect an increase in the shares reserved for use under the Plan.

All other terms and conditions of the Plan not otherwise modified hereby shall remain in full force and effect. The Amendment was approved by the Board of Directors on May 16, 2017 and submitted to the Company’s shareholders for approval in connection with the Company’s May 4, 2017 Annual Meeting.

A-1

Table of Contents

Appendix B

Oragenics, Inc.

Request for Interim Financial Statements

In accordance with National Instrument 54-102 of the Canadian Securities Administrators, registered and beneficial shareholders of the subject Corporation may elect annually to receive interim corporate mailings, including interim financial statements of the Corporation, if they so request. If you wish to receive such mailings, please complete and return this form to:

Oragenics, Inc.

Investor Relations

4902 Eisenhower Blvd., Suite 125

Tampa, Florida 33634

B-1

Table of Contents

Appendix C

PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF

ORAGENICS, INC.

TO BE HELD AT GRAND HYATT TAMPA BAY, 2900 BAYPORT DRIVE, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33607

ON THURSDAY MAY 4, 2017, AT 9:00 A.M., LOCAL TIME.

The undersigned shareholder of Oragenics, Inc. (the “Company”), Tampa, Florida, hereby constitutes and appoints Dr. Alan Joslyn with full power of substitution or in the place of the foregoing, Michael Sullivan as proxy holder, for and on behalf of the undersigned shareholder with the power of substitution to attend, act and vote the number of shares of Common Stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present at the annual meeting of Shareholders or at any adjournments thereof (the “Annual Meeting”), upon the proposals described in the Notice to the Holders of Common Stock of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement, both dated March 29, 2017, the receipt of which is acknowledged, in the manner specified below. The proxies, in their discretion, are further authorized to vote on any shareholder proposals not submitted to the Company for a vote of the shareholders at the Annual Meeting within a reasonable time prior to the mailing of the proxy materials, as well as on the election of any person as a Director if a Director nominee named in Proposal I is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, and on matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting. At the present time, the Board of Directors knows of no other business to be presented to a vote of the shareholders at the Annual Meeting.

This Proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed by the undersigned shareholder. If no direction is made, this Proxy will be voted FOR the election of the Directors listed on the reverse side and FOR Proposals II, III and IV.

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORAGENICS, INC. AND MAY BE REVOKED BY THE SHAREHOLDER PRIOR TO ITS EXERCISE. The undersigned reserves the right to revoke this Proxy at any time prior to the Proxy being voted at the Meeting. The Proxy may be revoked by delivering a signed revocation to the Company at any time prior to the Meeting, by submitting a later-dated Proxy, or by attending the Meeting in person and casting a ballot. The undersigned hereby revokes any proxy previously given to vote such shares at the Meeting.

C-1

Table of Contents

PROXY

A. PROPOSALS – The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals II, III and IV.

Proposal I: Election of Directors. On the proposal to elect the following Directors to serve until the indicated Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company and until their successors are elected and qualified:

Proposal II: Advisory vote on executive compensation.

☐  For            ☐  Against             ☐  Abstain

Proposal III: Ratification of the selection of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. as the Company’s independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2017.

☐  For            ☐  Against             ☐  Abstain

Proposal IV: To approve the amendment of our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Incentive Plan”) to increase the number of common shares available for issuance under the 2012 Incentive Plan by 1,500,000 shares.

☐  For            ☐  Against             ☐  Abstain

B. Authorized Signatures – This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below.

Please sign exactly as your name appears on your stock certificate and date. Where shares are held jointly, each shareholder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, trustee, or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in full partnership name by authorized person.

Shares Held:                                                                  

Signature of Shareholder                                                                      

Signature of Shareholder (If held jointly)                                     

Dated:                                                                                       

THIS PROXY FORM IS NOT VALID UNLESS IT IS SIGNED.

C-2

Table of Contents

Vote Your Proxy by Mail:
Mark, sign, and date your proxy card, then detach it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.
Please submit votes via mail by 7:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 3, 2017
F OL D AND DE T AC H H E R E AND R E AD T H E R E V E R SE SI DE
PR OX Y Please mark
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE ‘FOR’ ALL THE NOMINEES LISTED AND ‘FOR’ PROPOSALS II, III and IV. your votes X
like this
FOR AGAINST AB STAIN
I. Election of Directors FOR WITHHOLD AUTHORITY II. ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
NOMINEES: (01) Dr. Frederick W. Telling (02) Dr. Alan Joslyn
(03) Robert C. Koski III. RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF MAYER
FOR AGAINST AB STAIN
(04) Charles L. Pope HOFFMAN MCCANN P.C. AS THE COMPANY’S (05) Dr. Alan W. Dunton INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE YEAR
ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017
III. TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT OF OUR 2012 FOR AGAINST AB STAIN EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN (“THE 2012 INCENTIVE
PLAN”) TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES AVAILABLE FOR ISSUANCE UNDER THE 2012 INCENTIVE PLAN BY 1,500,000 SHARES
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED BY THE
UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED ‘FOR’ THE C OM PANY I D: ELECTION OF THE DIRECTORS LISTED HERE AND ‘FOR’ PROPOSALS II AND III.
PR OX Y NUM B E R : AC C OUNT NUM B E R :
Signature Signature Date , 2017
Note: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. When shares are held by joint owners, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, or corporate o_cer, please give title as such.

Table of Contents

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 4, 2017
This proxy statement and our 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at http://ir.oragenics.com/annual-reports
FOL D AND DE T AC H HE R E AND R E AD T HE R E V E R SE SI DE
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Oragenics, Inc.
The undersigned shareholder of Oragenics, Inc.(the “Company”), Tampa, Florida, hereby constitutes and appoints Dr. Alan Joslyn with full power of substitution or in the place of the foregoing, Michael Sullivan as proxy holder, for and on behalf of the undersigned shareholder with the power of substitution to attend, act and vote the number of shares of Common Stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present at the annual meeting of Shareholders or at any adjournments thereof (the “Annual Meeting”), upon the proposals described in the Notice to the Holders of Common Stock of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement, both dated March 29, 2017, the receipt of which is acknowledged, in the manner speci_ed below. The proxies, in their discretion, are further authorized to vote on any shareholder proposals not submitted to the Company for a vote of the shareholders at the Annual Meeting within a reasonable time prior to the mailing of the proxy materials, as well as on the election of any person as a Director if a Director nominee named in Proposal I is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, and on matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting. At the present time, the Board of Directors knows of no other business to be presented to a vote of the shareholders at the Annual Meeting.
This Proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed by the undersigned shareholder. If no direction is made, this Proxy will be voted ‘FOR’ the election of the Directors listed on the reverse side and ‘FOR’ Proposals II, III and IV.
(Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)